X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=tGQ 7v7pzxap1DFKfzkUoQOzufamxsdaR8mZ3wfILvh9q+paKaadd1oESkEMqLVHOTtJ 8sRm8QEPXogPmabtve6SeOmUEB4ptfHzjhBMeOD7Oinb+IGFOeq3ILDT/JMh+sSJ ybCk7LKF1yC5r8W7idRLkpRBO1Pd/zxCkI3DCg1A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=T5QKIsgoJ 8pOeGGFO/Fd6++KK0g=; b=vn+2x/TVNT5Y9EppRS4bLNqZZbN8jOiDNhtnZ35Ms BavnjV1JW64XhZPHF7gwPvANLz9JYvFpUBGL9PXJQkUanYTV+MgqGHgwHk6T2DzM +gh/Fv8wUq4aeRY5ixVr+LNnk/aS3gFkcR9mNIvfnvD5dyD7rEWnewp1AMUDQQw4 eY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Message-ID: <520E905A.409@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:49:30 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin Subject: Stack size on 64-bit Cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The problem that has been discussed at length in the thread "64-bit emacs crashes a lot" appears to have been solved on the emacs-devel list. (I say "appears to" because I'm waiting for Ryan to confirm this.) The problem went away for me when I built emacs with 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,--stack,4194304'. I'm wondering if it's just that emacs needs an unusually big stack or if the default stack size on 64-bit Cygwin should be increased for all applications. I noticed that ulimit -s gives 2025 on both 32-bit Cygwin and 64-bit Cygwin. Shouldn't 64-bit applications need a larger stack than 32-bit applications in general? Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple