X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=d2Y8U2uaZtiBz5Uo9REAsOFSM8HH/oaW/dXlL6SFqlsCxaqvEjRUg A0PFTRnjUXiyLdv33oVzn3eSeUG4QX7Vs7noQ3nYugU1ZZ1g8nVJszmekPDbIggo MLJTCpYY9zx1OEytjo4xkuaDmtc03kS+ZSBEf3kqluqXSptQ7ht3Fc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=lHrJ6g5+u+kjXyBcrdYYuiLkwhk=; b=nR+BonZMfSob0h4oMapM1COzra5q H5vJz0PA7l7/gXsmlCEHj08GJ0CWkMoLWQdtHRs0KxxNWSkDLxT+dt4NoC7DOd6V 2cH6dMRcHGF4kPIDzx3hHLJyXmhmFG3V76r6bKPwpLJLanSJNOPj1ZnnqloxL6wC q15/+HUqtyYiNpA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:34:05 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 64-bit Cygwin installation is missing /usr/bin/lockfile Message-ID: <20130814143405.GB22883@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20130814140415 DOT GJ4315 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130814140415.GJ4315@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Found: No --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 14 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 14 09:43, Steve Rowley wrote: > > > On 8/13/2013 6:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:29:46PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > >>> On 8/13/2013 5:01 PM, Steve Rowley wrote: > > >>> I just installed 64-bit Cygwin on Win7, and noticed that > > >>> /usr/bin/lockfile is missing in my installation. > > >>> > > >> As always, you can find what package something is in by searching fo= r it > > >> here: > > >> > > >> In the case of lockfile, you can see the results here: > > >> > > >> > > >> However note that, currently, this only searches the 32-bit version = of > > >> Cygwin. Some packages are still missing from the 64-bit version. > > > > > > The fact that some packages don't exist yet for 64-bit is something > > > that does deserve highlighting. Of course, whether or not the package > > > actually exists for 64-bit, the package search will tell you if it > > > exists in the 32-bit world, so at least one knows what to look for. > > > In this particular case, I did go looking to see if 'procmail' was > > > already available for 64-bit. As it turns out, it is. > >=20 > > Thank you for for the pointer to how to find the Cygwin package > > containing a file; that is indeed a useful thing to know. Since > > procmail is the home of /usr/bin/lockfile, I reinstalled procmail. > >=20 > > However, /usr/bin/lockfile is still missing. Unpacking the procmail > > 3.22-12 tarball reveals that it contains only the > > /usr/share/doc/procmail/ directory, and 4 small documentation files. > > The rest of procmail is missing. > >=20 > > If this is something that will take a while, then perhaps I should go > > back to the 32-bit installation so my scripts will work while waiting > > for a fix. But as uninstalling and reinstalling a rather large Cygwin > > installation is painful, I'd rather not do this if lockfile will be > > available in a week or so. > >=20 > > Does anyone have advice as to whether it's worth waiting vs going back > > to 32 bit? >=20 > It's just a packaging bug. Somehow I tripped over the order of variable > evaluation. I'm looking into it and provide a new 64 bit procmail later > today. I just uploaded procmail-3.22-13. Please give it a try. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSC5VdAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gFAEP/2i+8taIiuy+AVszDIYUJNjL Bn62l8qfWw9QypG5uSTRT0vzo/vmZ8wVdRS2eSsSTEt2w/AMdapqjX4vtU9L2q+W Z/nOrRs5U0MPiYhjzmGF0ssjrbqbFlhiRSlJjPGGOBTUzgUOueS7oDC5QE7UWffg lq4y+L5M0OGVQD3ytc5dQ7nawwFlum+5r2LA3Ni/KIhlbjPQ5vR5Khdb83u5Jdon RJnZipcOhEckD2iOamkBejCH1jfz3zx74jZpSYHQFGjeMc8/AQgcc5DWn9+lhavq H576j0mKv8cBvTp0zuQIykf43bTciwP7XgNIkhQ+ZUoQO/SWgaybGCY1OmX1y0IE TEYDNREL2rXfKpIRhTKRmkAXIlIwXU13RLbawYXolXHF3vaN03aNHDDg7tXJWemV rr6Q/ACmCzMIDE9VMNT818k8NwcoEjkOt+YlmwzA1QeGAZJf8QF7NMo8Qbs3PAgZ kheKz7OeXhwG4io70jX3CdiSbXnlzllT8HVrN5I+vZTJrw66cNJquPKT6JuX4aYi v24T4P1NvhrnGkntrLr6Q9KVSlG5VAa/TnBWhlVUGpEzzNaulv+4AIPUDiL7W3nW A/e7/l0UgBFLV6sjlERqy5vYvqYtq40RvtcLjIw2GivrYagbYn+dcdGasPjluo+X HPqUvSDCsKBPFKzqv+WT =5tMq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--