X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=MTV7OVqAsOhWywh+pvsKmEneJzJ5d+R2HOmA6Gtr5z4 j6drSGGh+8SJFkhBqseE/AQtoH7biiQ5PoPEvYbAoMzfjsIT5KY4FtCMjx2Lfa0m mYHaEgl7Ez+GrrEfHWUo5Dm6vSiM0POHVR6VoOKxRoQzRDeSrkaFz6JdTw7OoQtk = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=n/XkR/46Fa7iLyE7yHjggN1RA5Q=; b=PepQ8ERAcpZETX98s s2l6dfMuoqqKxpsEh5m3SU6V1GMgvdVNDT5iDCd/DX+8vKnf/q5qCEpz2Ek9Bqs3 l5ECXkiRV876cTPSehYQWmLF+0EjeyLIFHVQV/JRcnbowU+M+7kd33vr2p6scEH5 knMkSfZ5aufocGIDAahd3fMmnM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_THREADED,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <5203E3D9.2090509@etr-usa.com> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:30:49 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrey Repin Subject: Re: Telnet in latest Cygwin References: <5202BDED DOT 9030801 AT cygwin DOT com> <20130808070854 DOT GA19486 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1326593020 DOT 20130808150801 AT mtu-net DOT ru> In-Reply-To: <1326593020.20130808150801@mtu-net.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/8/2013 05:08, Andrey Repin wrote: > > Though, I fail to see, how Cygwin telnet is different from, say PuTTY. Or > native Windows telnet. Windows 8 doesn't come with telnet.exe installed by default, and when you install it from Programs and Features, it's invisible to Cygwin 32, apparently due to the SxS madness. Cygwin 64 *does* see it, but attempting to run it just drops you right back at a prompt, immediately. Even if it did run, wouldn't things like Ctrl-] break due to the problems Cygwin currently has running interactive native console programs? Windows' telnet.exe doesn't even run particularly well within cmd.exe. Telnetting to a local web server here, it didn't do local echo properly, so I couldn't see whether I'd typed "GET / HTTP1.0" correctly. (I had Cygwin telnet.exe renamed to cygtelnet.exe during this time, to ensure I wasn't picking it up by accident.) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple