X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pT/sth1aDRna70QGwwtyRabn1D9mFPB3dBeA8M+9ZLF L6dS7ji148oZ86UkUd8KJMIY0nCwxQc4td2itLEe7noqIYWn+3I/rSNxk+AwZCLJ bD71q1gCmGoEDj574+DgJhIrcRL9Sd8i01OeDZ3h6MDS7xaHKZ7fc/u7gxE1f7z0 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=kLtkXu2C8gd/n8HFl8sXHxz8HNM=; b=MV36OBFgWCSmM/kzZ taziC+oPXAkTYftg9wHcsM70okLOcxv6OE/9s5ySnAxzUscBq/gYHyb/pwGcvsXz sp6te7IQTLp7tqxazhFUBqlwe1cdoC+uN/A5quUxqVzkvKI/9dE7VQdPK+yB5gKe vdXAKWNQ+Wx9RtwSjvMIDQVOYQ= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <51FF15DE.5060706@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 23:02:54 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Updated: gcc-tools-epoch2-automake-1.11.6-1 References: <20130802134154 DOT 6FF5C6800A0 AT frontend2 DOT nyi DOT mail DOT srv DOT osa> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/3/2013 10:21 AM, Kelley Cook wrote: > Hi Charles, > > Are the dependencies correct here? No, they are not. Fixed on cygwin.com and in my local archive. Thanks for the headsup. > It seems counter intuitive, that the current of GCC automake would > require the installation of the out-of-date GCC autoconf. > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Charles Wilson > wrote: Please don't feed the spammers. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple