X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to :references; q=dns; s=default; b=SSyJeLk0+0jNAN3PDXtWklkA7fUzj8V KqBcJduZOwL34Sixi36A4vwA5ZvbqnHDq731jfNa7iYs2CeLawkKVehDchAr55TI n2T1vxOCJ+EqgQchW9LKDiUMr3Jn2J2lAWvRNTVU0Mt5kN1GJmBBi68LcSpNGtoX tb6YpvsMKAv0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to :references; s=default; bh=eSf4m012goTbUDlQ+dYN0TuRLps=; b=vAhbp 5sgl4XTewvOhJGl4doFmLqfcQCk3McNxKHIlPYakVDXRLZMm3qDc0WF9EwWpNdU9 8KUwkRDuSZM50VWazMILoCMF3xx2xQ8nI0vNcnze6QuOE87eN9SEAbT6O/hbKOHh LXXYYM4CwRpG411vcnVxqmW1WCTn1HwkmiiMOE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RDNS_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <20130805105021.1776@binki> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:50:21 +0900 From: wynfield AT gmail DOT com To: Subject: Re: checkX problem or misunderstanding In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 04 Aug 2013 21:05:36 -0400 <51FEFA60.2050707@cygwin.com> References: <20130803175444 DOT 3628 AT binki> <51FEFA60 DOT 2050707 AT cygwin DOT com> Larry Hall wrote: > > Re: checkX > > > > $ checkX --version > > run2 0.4.2 > > > > checkX doesn't work as I understand the description below: > > > > "DESCRIPTION > > Determines if X is installed, Xserver is running on specified DISPLAY > > and will accept clients. Returns 0 if yes, nonzero otherwise" > > > > > > Environment / Procedure to duplicate the error: > > > > - I have an X11 server running, started in pty0, where I will test checkX > > > > - In this pty0, I start an X11 server, which from the xinitrc starts up another mintty > > terminal, pty1 with Display environment variable set to :0 > > > > - Testing checkX in pty1 (which has DISPLAY set) returns a 0 or successful result. > > checkX :0 --> returns 0 > > > > - Moving back to pty0 and running the same command with the same argument gives: > > checkX :0 --> return 1 and error condition or no server available. > > > > > > However, if I simply manually set DISPLAY=:0 in pty0 X11 clients will run. > > > > - export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0 > > - checkX :0 --> Nnw reports an o.k. this server is useable. > > > > If one relied on checkX the runing server would be missed. It is doing > > nothing that a check if DISPLAY var is set or not andn then possible > > testing it. It should has used the value :0 I sent it and do some X11 > > stuff I am not aware of. > > Perhaps we're misunderstanding your confusion here. Can you explain what > about Chuck's description of checkX at the link below isn't clear? > > > > > -- > Larry It is clearly written in my message, in fact in imported it from the checkX documentation. What part of the problem I'm describing is not clear to you? "DESCRIPTION Determines if X is installed, Xserver is running on specified DISPLAY and will accept clients. Returns 0 if yes, nonzero otherwise"" In fact: checkX :0 returns a false when, but the X11 server on :0 will accept client requests. Exporting DISPLAY=:0 and running emacs, for example, demonstrates that X11 is available and accepting clients. > _____________________________________________________________________ end. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple