X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=ouaMAI0tqWV2Kau+NIEDJO00dV9KwFIkMVFFS8Oocvx uswtdiKxXOFsDWB8LT/ey6qhh/RP8WqA2OVQHj6iQ7sNqOm+ZyMWponY+EglN7F5 X8OcgkieYD3vkwyDBQwJ2+b+yE5SKVQRz2E4Gdps8Q+Y2qDLlIILOjkvVfBXJeX8 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=mpx4WGmypIhRpVA8AkuSU8mgmL8=; b=HxXfM+K7ASQVh3ovg aLrBSm1TmMHHKI0TjRZaTJ58AHWiQ0glSMyW0CIoMbejCtToijaQjh9WyGe0ZI0o LKurdP2lzeJThLhAcN+X38wdvpSzsZOctprEuOb1f1Dorm5JD8mt6lp2fSv0+uNI VKUsrJyB+sjuDsJV7t5AqCftaM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KHOP_THREADED,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <51FDBA2B.8020102@tlinx.org> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 19:19:23 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: having 1 set of non-bin files w/separate {bin,lib}[32/64)? (was Re: please update the supported Cygwin package list ...) References: <51F34FA0 DOT 50300 AT gmail DOT com> <51F35E4A DOT 4040207 AT gmail DOT com> <51F368C4 DOT 5030309 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51F9A3BE DOT 4020907 AT tlinx DOT org> <51F9ABA0 DOT 3090205 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51FCEA73 DOT 7030903 AT tlinx DOT org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Earnie Boyd wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Linda Walsh wrote: > > Hello Linda, > >> It seems to be the only reliable 32-bit redirection -- and MS chose to put >> it in the /windows dir... so they must want customers to put anything >> needing >> that feature in that dir...right?? ;-) Oi... > Absolutely not what MS intended for the /windows directory. That is > the OS directory and only MS installations should use it. ---- Sorry, I assume you did catch the irony. > > The /"Program Files" (64bit) and /"Program Files (x86)" (32bit) > directories are where MS directs developers to put their binaries. > However we don't like spaces in path names so this isn't a good > location. --- Which is why you create /prog->one /prog{32,64}->point to the other as mklink /d symlinks in the root of the fs. > > However you the user have a choice of where to put things. Frankly, I > would use /cygwin and /cygwin32 ---- And how does that get you the autoredirection I suggested with the links in Windows/syswow64 and windows/system32? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple