X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=oKZ/zhYIqzQUUEH1sikfEDuvjwehKruzEpOI1LmIOTv/5Pru0ugRB
	9KgHP1+2vw3SCMtiHrcefzIh4L5vf9F5v4wTYy8bFNtTt8fBj/fv1IXJJjyxjyDg
	4uoW19VoyywfRQYq+k9j76oYwWkW7fIFjTG0lqvlgP3NGzrEcvsuwo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=y0ft49wYzGeITSb4PBTJRiXRQ6U=; b=pxfSu9javjD5hzb51081BfkK2A8j
	Xb+4Rglh/ULg+ND3DiHxB4ZaOUa9yor8cdfQD6uMT2XXZSFTKB7GyiXhPUc6xXfR
	b3lHk1tRVQzRWjcyTQ3WZl7XVEKptdDqyEgpFEkhy+llgn+ewI86S3+8ypvrNl5x
	7YPkUvDTCK8503I=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+lW+OZUlAKIau09Hbmlg4a
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:05:36 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs
Message-ID: <20130801150536.GA8100@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 5 DOT 6 DOT 2 DOT 20130731150650 DOT 03acc868 AT binnacle DOT cx> <757240388 DOT 20130801133807 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <757240388.20130801133807@mtu-net.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:38:07PM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
>Greetings, starlight.2013z3!
>>Some people like myself cannot abide subscribing to firehose mailing
>>lists and prefer to view discussion threads with a browser.  It does
>>not mean contributors, direct or indirect, are any of value.  Even if I
>>were a direct contributor monitoring it closely, I would /dev/null the
>>list and browse it.
>
>But it do mean that you break threading with your replies, making is
>hard to read archives after your bursts.

The other problem is that he forwarded someone's private (very
reasonable) email to the cygwin list because he probably didn't realize
that it was a private correspondence.  That is a breach of netiquette.

Also: http://xkcd.com/357/

cgf


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple