X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=x3fKldW1jF0IPggA SvWLnJmd7cNr9wsyuSSP7RywBj2cCSTA/EKJM/+m7GNl0gzMlKSKtXW8UkNCghTd xloirU58EXeHocd+/7cHfesX6wGIY3+XWKw23xjGf8AMG1Syj7b6hmGuitA/Kdwf 6LQS4ziifKRLr+SgGwaOoLC+9jo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=6pJWSTCQ280h80+55fXrg4 2fNc0=; b=HwitHUYTKI67Wq8DcedC0grMatAWMY8Gq8LCFdsg+fnW7CQLURL9U+ 5Ewn9iTz0Ke1jF0pfu6UHdlA/IPTksf684+pxEi7CrKUSOkC/fK4EaFipWnhfxgN ApXOcJpSRpa/4eOSvuL3/l6iN4Yu+0r3a0eiuB1hjlDndwlQX/mb8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:38:07 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <757240388.20130801133807@mtu-net.ru> To: starlight DOT 2013z3 AT binnacle DOT cx, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130731150650.03acc868@binnacle.cx> References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 5 DOT 6 DOT 2 DOT 20130731150650 DOT 03acc868 AT binnacle DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, starlight DOT 2013z3 AT binnacle DOT cx! > Some people like myself cannot abide subscribing > to firehose mailing lists and prefer to view > discussion threads with a browser. It does not > mean contributors, direct or indirect, are any > of value. Even if I were a direct contributor > monitoring it closely, I would /dev/null the > list and browse it. But it do mean that you break threading with your replies, making is hard to read archives after your bursts. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 01.08.2013, <13:37> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple