X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=YkaNBT97Eec8EdUkhcgJV1VV0ofPruWURrWiyTM9Dmd
	MgZyqKQ8FmlFbyiHe4PgzAQR44a97KBh81Vr5yeb0i/i0+NZeuJ65kMEBse1tKjv
	olFQkMQZ4uoK19dlfBtPAW0MVSndVaAiCa3+ATBcAGJHOWVh9yPrKmlgw4U+jYwM
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=qe6PYUqZWLvTbfqKcldFp44B1ZY=; b=E9t9IkHzdJCQfrmQF
	Ek1j0TAu8ZnFd/wiWX5oCd5cgriet+WJF1P/nf4JuMEqn/L6CPav94eZ6E4DYC2a
	nor14Xf5Ta2s2Bsb5SpiSlXDSaHllueU1/+gys2ZUnkNpE/zDupQVmAsM0alkF7F
	wj3oUal5z7OmejBMbyJILkvoVc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received: by 10.66.155.102 with SMTP id vv6mr3885897pab.89.1374609274028;        Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51EEDF75.9050007@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:54:29 -0500
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 64-bit gcc-4.8.1 package installs source instead
References: <51EEF4F1 DOT 20006 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <51EDA65A DOT 4070002 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <51EEF9D8 DOT 6060907 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20130723072212 DOT GC9689 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51EE3CBB DOT 3010005 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20130723161626 DOT GA1199 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20130723161626.GA1199@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2013-07-23 11:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:20:11AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> This is one case where IMO genini is better than upset: genini-generated
>> setup.ini's don't list source-only packages in setup's package selector,
>> while still being available through the "Src" option of any of its
>> subpackages.  Could upset be changed to match, which would avoid this
>> problem for *all* source-only packages?
>
> Why not just rename the package "gcc-src" to make it clear what's going
> on?

gcc is only one example; many packages (most being library-only) have a 
source-only "main" package.  Not listing them while still allowing Src 
(as genini does) makes things very clear IMHO.


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple