DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=LUV227uQ7Buz2Qj+a/t/LQuIBjyeFIT7NjQGFq9VbFVR2Tr4aLqBd
	6jTd9LQ1VnTBUTooqB+tQSxM0lX/KhFGUCydfG3IDI00FGhpu/dc3bEePW3pDatK
	Dc6fowbGlilM5Wk7r2FBvnwHMsn9FKDkgsMBPfZQYwsi8FiipAKGCc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:16:26 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 64-bit gcc-4.8.1 package installs source instead
Message-ID: <20130723161626.GA1199@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <51EEF4F1 DOT 20006 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <51EDA65A DOT 4070002 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <51EEF9D8 DOT 6060907 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20130723072212 DOT GC9689 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51EE3CBB DOT 3010005 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51EE3CBB.3010005@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:20:11AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 2013-07-23 02:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul 23 17:47, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>>> On 07/22/2013 05:38 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>>> gcc is only a source-only meta-package; you want to install
>>>> gcc-core, gcc-g++, etc.
>>> Oh, that's a little different than (a) the name suggests and (b)
>>> historical precedent, which IIRC had "gcc" as a meta package that
>>> pulled in all the other gcc-related stuff you'd need.
>>>
>>> Anyway, thanks for the tip, I'll try that.
>>
>> Shouldn't we introduce an empty gcc binary archive for just this
>> situation?
>
>This is one case where IMO genini is better than upset: genini-generated 
>setup.ini's don't list source-only packages in setup's package selector, 
>while still being available through the "Src" option of any of its 
>subpackages.  Could upset be changed to match, which would avoid this 
>problem for *all* source-only packages?

Why not just rename the package "gcc-src" to make it clear what's going
on?

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple