X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=gV8gK6bkAVn+JkuO7BDpU/G3m+FOQsFCsENn5gGtQKY AeqtbVlNbKn9/mYKYy3WRYjpUy5Ngc4Ik/ddPju2rzTNQClKZ9UeN/7K+5cj7ha1 1VYSP+rvwk2B/uo/vG8nnVl2yJGxiWnCGmdzPpc6BEzeiNYmNwebwXgVVmzZcVb0 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=//f4yusJMx08sfHTKy7HZV5ghck=; b=jwIjv5fuobdd5yARE uE1j+AygMttX+BP5NMA9R/Wd7n/5th0lEe/azhG6Zp/oKEjSiM7MGPm452g6Ja57 klad8TLhYOu+2aG610zr6Pu/36KnbSNPJ758DOeJtGtJtMSfkwiEh0WWIy1T4cKM Y5y2yJMsOoq5iU1XAlaUQVIam0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 From: Pavel Fedin

To: "'Andrew Schulman'" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000001ce7e08$2b866830$82933890$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <4q4ut8had25hqmo8b0752i8asuv6ism2qh AT 4ax DOT com> <002901ce7f0a$9da99420$d8fcbc60$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <002601ce82b7$63229580$2967c080$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> In-reply-to: Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix optional variables in libargp Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:32:11 +0400 Message-id: <002a01ce86c6$ba32a190$2e97e4b0$%fedin@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Hello! I have successfully tested it on i386. Really, just remove PREFIX completely and it's okay. GetProcAddress() appears to be "clever" and adds the leading underscope by itself on i386. I don't know what you did wrong and why you could not reproduce the solution. However, i have one idea. After patching libargp you need to recompile your test case. Because it needs to pick up __declspec(dllexport). > Fedin, thanks for sending this. I've tested it for x86_64, and it > works there. However in x86, in my testing I can't get it to work. I > tried removing the PREFIX function, and after that it did work once, > but I've tried it again several times and now I can't reproduce that. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple