X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=XNEr0EMvWwZbwDU53kHGUAGc0ZOKeQm/HHdSViO5XdMqsN3U9T/92 gxenNqiiF8SeHfhyWkCufdefqd+FtMRvglEKACxA6cYakBDQgFfbA++px5o5/Rxn 1sDP8UKI762mNc7cfRG8Se/WH+WI9W8Kr6lRDZbhZ0Q2fVSM1SLlVM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Tqc/rEqttuSGyDonX5WJy6IxZMk=; b=XQTt2MpQ+jB/ydC2g2QfEZLzVDed 2fvdjOv7sg6saKacTPzKpzn/vw/u3i8z/0vTASrpSHEtgdWjBftCAyxFxo+gc4MS WoGd75ihptFkEqFRZUpyoOLJ/aqfNaBpEB1bhE2o6274faArwmjP1cuQ5MQoXUUW xjqqQIIDJJvVVOA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix optional variables in libargp Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 19:46:02 -0400 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <000001ce7e08$2b866830$82933890$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <4q4ut8had25hqmo8b0752i8asuv6ism2qh AT 4ax DOT com> <002901ce7f0a$9da99420$d8fcbc60$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <002601ce82b7$63229580$2967c080$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt > I have tested the implementation on x86-64 with RedHat's Prelink utility, > and it works quite fine. i386 should work too, but please retest, just in > case. Fedin, thanks for sending this. I've tested it for x86_64, and it works there. However in x86, in my testing I can't get it to work. I tried removing the PREFIX function, and after that it did work once, but I've tried it again several times and now I can't reproduce that. So at this point your patch doesn't work in x86 for me. I'd appreciate it if someone else could test it, or suggest a modification to make it work. Andrew -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple