X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=dSSwJpOihFlZLWnB7tlFQ5CFY2Zy4sww3kcyhq7v6IIdR0eUgYxZp
	X4VfHCB/dljGKoJ1+lBEygCT/Dt0Q6NW93UNWvMSMiIzPulFqL+nlYQmKmOujl6O
	8Lu6C+Zjsd8P31zbRRSQ5JfFUrPCQvf0rzTQz1iwZZITxDSxxAcUa0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=RTVI6pFkJ9QDDvBDBgheDts0Qm8=; b=qYcUN6OZ8FknlHp54QWpkHjj0Aux
	0hF7CbtGSdHhVKrJ45mHz/QNuO/Kkfi53U9TKq4UyGqND9mOctRfIioBxFG+uodQ
	wFb3rPrXISF64y+GMNSu+FvQBQo2Kw4T5OVYs6mYd12R8yXMm6jf6rfCUXbOlxmn
	S9KYoB91AUy2DHE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+RDpq9kAG5aRrfUgV6/py/
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:51:30 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc - Is the C function select thread safe??
Message-ID: <20130719145130.GA2745@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1374159471 DOT 12713 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <107C24740CC429479D55901D6AAD17E43C536AC032 AT EMV61-UKRD DOT domain1 DOT systemhost DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <107C24740CC429479D55901D6AAD17E43C536AC032@EMV61-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:25:51PM +0100, trefor DOT 2 DOT edwards AT bt DOT com wrote:
>I have a very recent version of Cygwin (see cygcheck.out attached) and
>an test application (attached) which has been extracted from the SIPP
>application.

Try a snapshot:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00392.html

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple