X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=ZI05PVCOlGZiHAuGkWJ2VbVNA1ZXu9eVS05MlU7A6/ro6jxILQAjK KBRYxHP1Xl4Ep19rwQwI+mvvF5iTA05qrFLgrzzp4n+5JEMSvnSL5SsBoLmv8xY5 +I/9VwyqyccoFnjk9NaQx6hXcGgaoOBDAuCELr3pgi1cgA3vYmCNuU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=UvG1sPAzvAyZ/hXOjeSuwc+wpN0=; b=et8skQst2HJh6y/iejVBFLWiWHAa oFQqaJn11my0LtWibsth/uK7xhLypv8Uk+ZTg5ZDvYfWrp6+lKbcEd6ZX2zsckgi CaV8eE17TvZa4aigXqYRJGvWyEqQtFIBel4G5WdNB5c29/1pEGMBQViiQlkIDqen OXNieFIxB3PEFAo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:08:09 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sqlite defect Message-ID: <20130719100809.GD20871@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51E703FB DOT 1010300 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51E74AB4 DOT 7010508 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130718085953 DOT GC9628 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130719100329 DOT GC20871 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130719100329.GC20871@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Jul 19 12:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 19 10:56, jojelino wrote: > > On 2013-07-18 PM 5:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:> On Jul 18 17:11, > > jojelino wrote: > > >> On 2013-07-18 AM 10:53, Warren Young wrote: > > >>> Nothing so simple. Locking is handled at the OS and/or Cygwin DLL > > >>> level. The build change between 3.7.16.2 and 3.7.17-3 is that > > we're now > > >>> relying on new features in the Cygwin DLL to do Windows-style > > locking by > > >>> default. > > >>> > > >>> Older versions of Cygwin SQLite bypassed the Cygwin DLL entirely for > > >>> this, going straight to the Win32 API, thereby preventing the DLL from > > >>> interposing itself for the "posix" case. > > >>> > > >> Mandatory locking feature of cygwin used in sqlite is broken. > > > > > > Simple testcase in plain C? > > Thanks, but... > > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > int > > main() > > { > > int fd = open("asdf.txt", O_BINARY | O_RDWR | O_NOINHERIT | O_CREAT); > > const char* buf = > > "KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK\0"; > > int i=0; > > write(fd, buf, strlen(buf)); > > fcntl(fd,F_LCK_MANDATORY,0); > > assert(flock(fd,F_SETOWN)==0); > ^^^^^^^^ > F_SETOWN is no valid flag for flock(2). ...and, btw., fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN) is only supported on sockets. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple