X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=GA JXiiWwZ7cASSQGr5fgk0+E2arVY0tefN8vUdoi3gR5YQn4aknAnxFQq9b4hi5h7m 4BFSeEtB2NJcRorDxmu7iy6a/hLFML3TACUSEmEFc7WqRcdXueMFqRagG9+laj7t e+aNpi3va1wFoI59Bqk/JfEFiLTJcMC7c0sk6cs8s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=l3MVMVmr l6LW24rYYQSzNwFNyEQ=; b=bVMiCrcE3OYRZFVv2h9pXvF+Uuc1an7BaTWegZwd cHBIx0FIl4x+QyUvmxk3XtIhZglVeMeSAOXQigKUsGPmuI8szvNZ7tktKuhxB2U9 PDy0KIC17FWAclV+56tHfNbQx3os3Z6UNgey/DMOpX/AtX914DZMX8TAgdP4tfy6 HfE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,TW_YG autolearn=no version=3.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.195.195 with SMTP id ed3mr636308vcb.33.1373989961638; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:52:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: run2-0.4.2-1 From: K Stahl To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=089e0153814896a8dd04e1a2f7bb X-Virus-Found: No --089e0153814896a8dd04e1a2f7bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry, my first message got lost in the mailer. Basically, I updated today and noticed that checkX segfaults (see attachment). I've tried both the latest and previous versions, and they both fail now. Any help would be appreciated. On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:45 AM, K Stahl wrote: > Just reverted the run2 package to 0.4.0-1 and checkX still segfaults. > > Attached is the output of cygcheck (for reference) --089e0153814896a8dd04e1a2f7bb Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="checkX.exe.stackdump" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="checkX.exe.stackdump" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_hj7a55nu1 RXhjZXB0aW9uOiBTVEFUVVNfQUNDRVNTX1ZJT0xBVElPTiBhdCBlaXA9NjEx MEM4OTANCmVheD1CODE0QzQ4MyBlYng9QjgxNEM0ODMgZWN4PTAwMDA3Qzg5 IGVkeD0wMDAwMDAwMSBlc2k9MjAwMDAwMDAgZWRpPUI4MTRDNDdCDQplYnA9 MDAyOEE5NjggZXNwPTAwMjhBOEUwIHByb2dyYW09QzpcY3lnd2luXGJpblxj aGVja1guZXhlLCBwaWQgMTA0NjAsIHRocmVhZCBtYWluDQpjcz0wMDIzIGRz PTAwMkIgZXM9MDAyQiBmcz0wMDUzIGdzPTAwMkIgc3M9MDAyQg0KU3RhY2sg dHJhY2U6DQpGcmFtZSAgICAgRnVuY3Rpb24gIEFyZ3MNCjAwMjhBOTY4ICA2 MTEwQzg5MCAoNjEwMDY3MTksIDAwMjhBQjk4LCAwMDI4QUI5QywgNzczRDE5 MkUpDQowMDI4QUJCOCAgMDA0MDE4NTggKDAwNDAwMDAwLCAwMDAwMDAwMCwg MDA4MTIyMzksIDAwMDAwMDAxKQ0KMDAyOEFDMzggIDAwNDA0ODFEICgwMDAw MDAyRSwgMDAwMDAwNjUsIDAwMjhBRDA4LCA2MTAwN0ZBNSkNCjAwMjhBRDA4 ICA2MTAwN0ZBNSAoMDAwMDAwMDAsIDAwMjhDRDk0LCA2MTAwNzExMCwgMDAw MDAwMDApDQpFbmQgb2Ygc3RhY2sgdHJhY2UK --089e0153814896a8dd04e1a2f7bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple --089e0153814896a8dd04e1a2f7bb--