X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject :from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q= dns; s=default; b=l9TawFRDq8nxWi69dGMtYbspS/rGqkwhb8qNbOvEPePheD XRU7pwczclD1lYg5RsIGxzwdpMo6YgI3UQE7OtmRut7LXapjzCt3HAdnXtiJdCkm V8Nq9ySQGv3nvGcUDluYOdb7Mc/zPuiCKMq+WKdycX4snYBoN4Ysf/PVDlVFc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject :from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= default; bh=UHPI+B4C0L+h1uInTz0y9krjsbA=; b=F+zy+vNgPbqQNPz3CLZc Bg6G3PTg1Zf1eNA0QAS591ZXuKoNL6DHEEHxYR1Ca5toxhu7pNBagg3S+61xrbsu 2Nc88H+ame51Qelakfjq8HBa1a8RebvU7FRDS2oPdVKR9dgmqbGplHvFZEy1gjzQ qpTdmbiaa0lypw/VWzoRu0o= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20130707170420.GA7298@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <03025504b8f3e69121da8ebf52a6a9dc DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20130707170420 DOT GA7298 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 23:25:09 +0200 Subject: Re: cygwin1.dll hangs since cygwin 1.7.20 (1.7.19) From: "Henri" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 05:34:16PM +0200, Henri wrote: >>Btw, cygcheck -s still shows on error output: >> >>cygcheck: Wrong architecture. Only ix86 executables supported. (8 times). > > Several people have reported that here and I've noticed it myself. This > report was due to the fact that are several .dll symlinks (?) in /bin > and one 64-bit dll in /bin. These aren't really errors and shouldn't, > IMO, be displayed as if they were. Understood. One more riddle gone. Thank you. Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple