X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ek kUD//J2WdgM1eSZY9xoBrNKyDgaCTPEdLAWEUcJSENmFA5aknYkBfsTDR8rR9ndY El3EPsY5P77tUs4rhBmFP+TCZhPlZPE52ehUjFpX+1kBs6pV18Zy1L3R3eu7FUNY yscHmtJ+z7f48fSUC/OfnJZoZjLklrBihYLrfTyOw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=GgHwLqm8 +kG0fccUYy3OL3wEeO0=; b=YwWjaxZ4B6LazxEkHZck3Aexif9MLIuiBkGBdjd9 FGlYipg84Mx9w4hylLAOi0/se8dapTzpkg0IZD/6RshNE8fCctBxAd0WlR6x1d8F WB8iKBa3JeWO55U2hQxowzJRE5XnfjLFNyMC1t7Uswmk/Zy0SWxDRYW1qgNo0iGl 5uw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.15.31.198 with SMTP id y46mr14662584eeu.135.1373074221205; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:30:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <227807788.20130706001526@mtu-net.ru> References: <227807788 DOT 20130706001526 AT mtu-net DOT ru> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:30:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mintty not responding to ctrl-c From: Balaji Venkataraman To: Andrey Repin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > If it's something like what we've faced recently, and native NT console does > not exhibit such behavior, try the snapshot cygwin1.dll. I did see that thread and thought it was perhaps related to that. And yes, I was using a fairly recent snapshot (Snapshot date: 20130627-19:17:14) - see the cygcheck output in the original email. Would appreciate any leads. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple