X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=fgMZS+z86KaCFVK3UkCOkRki7JhWD9zZA6l6wTBmTs/tJjXP6J3yQ 7sRHsmMun4NZAq5col8wPjiXVnlsj3BcuJUxhsolgamvMyPBFPteM/bIn0wo4Drt fVYrDWZM6v2+wSyhmFOpq71FaBSApsrh+9yRovbAmYQo7glFjlSIv4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=HdGggfDBMaKt1TFaCs7gQ4pBdtI=; b=C5nVwvHZEYFpMw9YeMV6MOpLGv9w x/qjeIAZQzKNOQe7MHu//MdENUXiaBu8tNIlQjZH4WDU6g0qCxH14oNEPcO7aKcZ MIB1+SRKX8TvlA5Xmkx8DSD5khJNZmb2k7XL+USlMNn4g40aV/E73oOKQXINTF+d IZqIqXdbPOrhLi8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:09:44 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: base-files-4.1-2 Message-ID: <20130705120944.GA6219@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51D6AEF1 DOT 8000404 AT cornell DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51D6AEF1.8000404@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Jul 5 07:33, Ken Brown wrote: > base-files-4.1-2 was released as a test version in March 2012. Is > there a plan to promote it to current? I'm not aware of any > problems with it. I just tried it on 64 bit, and I see some problems. - /etc/postinstall/base-files-mketc.sh Only cosmetically: The dos file warning when creating the service files is annoying. Setting CYGWIN=nodosfilewarning might be a good idea. - /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh Calls getfacl without path. Assuming tcsh is your login shell, at the time this is run under tcsh, there's no default PATH set, so the script doesn't find the tools: /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 46: touch: command not found Using the full path for all tools would fix that. Other than that it's ok I think. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple