X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=DACUVbQjbuqBueQdoHdhVxtpdT3ZQNuyTjAl/cLxtUO 1bYJSD7bVPvHMB16N5oKfnkwwTj1SOgVzXrMfIzIbl2CRaKln1tq8d31XyXAJa7a xQxE8aFselkKVmw1au4taHbzTgLOvGtQboLYqcE63W3n7yJToLf93IV5ykzX1TTw = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=LWqL2UK+wxwSQl1xMVQ2CP2MZls=; b=o1WLf5r65HW+sw9gD +Fi+WSNd/dEEzXPLfth/w3q7ncUWVfVFKav5X/0Wnn02n6487vrMnPJM5vAmP6gb P3fMtq0MnZWlRqPlnuNwEoFY6/TMlA39LEnxDyzHk2Uf3TsO/c4oKIY4g7x8Z1Z+ bGzkY9IQCrLcEPNZpUiuRjn9Wc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <51D58AE1.1080001@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:46:57 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: MSYS mode (continue) References: <20130704085847 DOT GK5118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130704091632 DOT GM5118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130704101046 DOT GN5118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130704103708 DOT GA12995 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130704121617 DOT GC12995 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20130704121617.GC12995@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/4/2013 8:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I'm ok with that, but I think we should drop the "32" from MINGW in > the first place. > > Does anybody rely on the "WOW64" in uname -s output? I just checked > the scripts in /bin in my installation and none of it seems to check > for that info. > > And then again, it *is* redundant, given the uname -m output... cygwin64$ uname -s CYGWIN_NT-6.1 cygwin64$ uname -m x86_64 cygwin32$ uname -s CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 cygwin32$ uname -m i686 Yep, seems redundant. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple