X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=j/WEyfvmCc45uyrZT8+nwl3nt4gjsBEnfj5a9rLYN/ihH+WcW5Ej7 KFrHlUIlUJrS2WyZG9Bm99UncTDMXuh+BJL7AixnGCcYGgfxR5mf+7Wni5qWiBdU F2zpUNPkMediH8lbgKOxil5Zel114t5yaJvAZbTnAskCCWzimCmKc8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=6ZwBa21K8zN7WmzQhfedjhd7jSQ=; b=T+Xbg+AxGL47VwnKDQFghJ/3O9go q0yNxrfCJAkrvyjYwRJe1QW8GsBmlHu+DcrUvI6VoSp5bOYdcwuk/jgD8jmz5Hog V3GPYnJOKgKZUw3dv0ktVOC3uRDOND5upgkAcKD+u0x1wwCS6acilPENG4Z97DRZ QvofZt6QsGdMbJ0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:30:48 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch' Message-ID: <20130703133048.GG5118@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51D39491 DOT 9040501 AT email DOT com> <20130703123326 DOT GF5118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51D42171 DOT 9010701 AT email DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51D42171.9010701@email.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Jul 3 15:04, Peter B. wrote: > > On 03.07.2013 14:33 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jul 3 05:03, Peter B. wrote: > >> On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>> I'll build a new patch 2.7.1 for 32 bit today. I hope that fixes it > >>> for 32 bit as well. > >> The new 2.7.1 (32bit) brakes CRLF handling for me completely. The old > >> 2.6.1 works properly. 2.7.1 with text files converted from CRLF to LF > >> works properly as well. > >> > >> Can you take a look at the download link below? It includes an example > >> file (with CRLF), the corresponding patch (LF) and the two binaries > >> (patch v2.6.1 and v2.7.1). > >> > >> http://www60.zippyshare.com/v/13352963/file.html > > Please provide a direct link which doesn't require to enable scripting > > in a web browser to download. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Corinna > > > Please download this picture (jpg) and rename the file suffix to 7z or > open with corresponding archiver directly. > > http://abload.de/img/patchfus75.jpg (99KB) Thanks. The behaviour here is a deliberate upstream choice to apply the patch only if the line endings are the same as in the file to patch. If you really must apply non-CRLF patches to CRLF files, consider using a temporary text mount: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-utils.html#mount Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple