X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=YMUFDxoO62Rjawx2GrMHB9wDmVEQz4VRyOa4+LMpZxeRTXp6nbOo0
	0K+4yM3rGMh7P2DV1coJZHs+yEbfvOEd2ezVUE1NmYwsOeZDDT1Nr0dy4f85Nzx/
	DqpiLNJsUxwa2s+XDh+XZt6AMhZXCkhYFw9UEMyVtQWGNjQjLClueA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=mgw+VRf3yuuy62bHQZwRu4cmJFw=; b=UVqkoNURZfgmJa+1CFeW+tYCp3j+
	YeQIMfnZDby58xCpw9qoQQo3erZ+88rgyHRSsgSe/dq5xlNc/vXuyYNXtaCH7vdl
	yncTGmd/1N8eKdgM91qPjKnyYYyIxsmNRyDrEgl858vX1Kwhd29LmpUP+bfI/sJo
	56oO/FQ0VxeSZXA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:03:36 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: autoreconf/gettext puzzle (was Re: sed match DOS end of line)
Message-ID: <20130627170336.GL2378@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <01E9402441FFBB4BBEA0A82549A7D94A0C27C5 AT ORD2MBX02C DOT mex05 DOT mlsrvr DOT com> <20130627142405 DOT GA2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130627144952 DOT GB2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51CC5D69 DOT 40700 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20130627155133 DOT GF2378 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130627155133.GF2378@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jun 27 17:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 27 10:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > On 2013-06-27 09:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >Ok, here's me, even more puzzled.  FIW, the 4.2.2 packages have *not*
> > >been built the same way as the 4.2.1 package.  The difference is running
> > >autoreconf (4.2.2) vs. not running autoreconf (4.2.1).
> > 
> > Were these natively compiled or cross-compiled?  The latter pulls in
> > gnulib functions in place of libc's (Cygwin) without intervention
> > during configure.
> > 
> > >If I build sed with the auto configury unchanged, I'm back to an sed
> > >which handles the CR just as the old sed 4.2.1 package:
> > >
> > >   $ sed --version | head -1
> > >   sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2
> > >   $ od -c eol
> > >   0000000   e   n   d   o   f   l   i   n   e  \r  \n
> > >   0000013
> > >   $ sed 's/e$/X/' < eol
> > >   endoflinX
> > >
> > >However, 4.2.2-1 and 4.2.2-2 packages have been built running autoreconf
> > >first, which, besides other things, updates the included gettext stuff
> > >from version 0.17 to version 0.18.1.
> > >
> > >So I'm wondering if the latest gettext is the culprit here, but I'm not
> > >fluent enough in the differences within gettext to see where the problem
> > >is.
> > 
> > I doubt it; as long as libintl is dynamically linked, the gettext
> > build infrastructure just handles .po.mo rules.
> 
> Yeah, I seem to be entirely on the wrong track, sorry about that.
> 
> I'm just inspecting the sources and it seems that the read mode of
> files has changed from "rt" to "r" between 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 for some
> reason.
> 
> I'm still digging, and I'm unsure how I could create a version of
> sed 4.2.2 which did the right thing at all a couple of minutes ago.
> 
> Still digging...

I have no idea how I screwed up so badly while testing.  It was actually
just a missing "t" flag in a call to fopen which has been lost between
4.2.1 and 4.2.2.

I just uploaded and announced 4.2.2-3 which should fix this issue, and I
sent the patch upstream.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple