X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=yJRh rgSf5ZEbhM3ax2icWmI3f0Pi/pgoBZKS8PRyhxYEu7ot/D11/bXYkMdkZG1fAQw0 xvbIBe3jlbY5t+6aRZeuFLmvXrWTvOe5uUi4D2IbjsONnCvyp7TFSgtQaxAqzUpY XofDpkaU2gGHwFcDxxntsv3D8rjfT6lUKzD+zak= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=ytsAmZkk7n jgv2AGuZ14Sv5uLaI=; b=X/nkNlZ5q7aKFGDL46m41c80ggkL0xrdOtRfFNbq1m WGV4YFKVGLtg7ZMyhtvs6IE3vOdj1f0U/WRmqmNvKo8Nyo8j7LKWS/6g3qRTH2dH QO1JLSeJbWLhlLJGZQbpOo1zDIuXH0S+rnkbw1KKiDCS9XmRF4yG0C3+Od0FPahy w= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:27:18 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Failure with fork() Message-ID: <20130627112718.GC25217@calimero.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51CC2018 DOT 2010608 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51CC2018.2010608@cs.utoronto.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Jun 27 07:20, Ryan Johnson wrote: > On 27/06/2013 5:35 AM, Arjen Markus wrote: > >Hello, > > > >the bug I am reporting here on behalf of Alan Irwin surfaced in the > >combination wine and Cygwin (Alan summarised it here: > >http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2013-June/100328.html). It > >has to do with the way Cygwin handles forks. > > > >The bug can be illustrated with this small program: > > > >int main(void) { > > while(!fork()); > > return 0; > >} > > > >It is meant to enable infinite forking, but on Cygwin it immediately > >stops. I tried > >it on both Cygwin (not via wine but simply Windows 7) and Linux: > >- On Linux the program continues without any problem > >- On Cygwin it stops immediately with an error message that the child process > > terminated unexpectedly with some weird return code. > > > >Can anyone shed light on this? This bug is a showstopper for the > >combination wine and Cygwin. > Out of curiosity, why do you need a fork bomb? Does the script just > capture the effect of multiple fork calls in quick succession? How > many forks can you pull off before it croaks, and is that number > consistent from run to run? I'd be shocked if it really died > "immediately" -- as in "zero forked children" -- so it would be > interesting to see if the issue is related to the number of fork > calls (resource exhaustion of some kind), or just to how quickly > they run back to back (data race of some kind). It dies after somewhat below 500 forks and I think I found the reason. Stay tuned. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple