X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=yWm3Br5wTvpZlIbeTIdY470qe9gb6QLwpHIzj2NE/V3
	YzonFDvFSzk8bQ2AEgXHsVG+sW7NMICH7/2IeoafvR3FTMdi3w34ndOztQ2xK14x
	tF347gOjjQcDaKKGLk6lt09N8Vj3T1u7vpNjUhb3IlsaIfx4vsYfItK6FMbJwHac
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=GUNmNyPPqs6K/Z18LsWRldoVrt4=; b=UWI2dJzgXRNdxM5t+
	BZiWD3SmiDEekZTjrx17hG025sxft0b4RqjKOVWr1jFsSM8TXzyuhYXH+v6taU0C
	9al8tWTvh1m1JpsOLfvtbPfoIeVCRMZpHkg3fxPveUOxlbnMzzT7o5XUMY1dJUf0
	fbspJhSiDGN7JEkmiFzhy5qAP8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-ID: <51C3D96F.1050300@etr-usa.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:41:19 -0600
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: cygport limitations
References: <CABEPuQJDLjtbcLig1isTUJgb6RBCD8LNShbm9mTPcb9WM5S5fw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<51C0B08E DOT 8080900 AT etr-usa DOT com> <CABEPuQJJpRfPKSwZ7M0eTOdp1HxDcmvuy1=qXFHBw-8kLkZ1ZQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51C0D956 DOT 4090905 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51C1B299 DOT 1000701 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <51C1F0F9 DOT 70601 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51C1FA8E DOT 3000307 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <51C33F38 DOT 4080103 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51C34D7C DOT 3080703 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <51C34D7C.3080703@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 6/20/2013 12:44, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>
> There should NEVER be a reason that you can't use cygport for your
> packages.  If you're having an issue, just provide your (draft)
> cygport(5) and ask.

Thanks for the offer.  I've left myself a note to try this again for the 
next ctags release.

I have no idea if there ever will be a new Exuberant Ctags.  The last 
release came out 4 years ago, and activity to the ctags-devel list has 
been under 1 post per month[*] for the past 6 months.

I'd be willing to convert 5.8 to cygport if this plan of Corinna's for 
an automated build server goes through.

[*] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=ctags-devel

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple