X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=h6hS5gl6vD307UOCA/fly++xSNB4p36fLyyXmkZ9LTo gYcR3PJsTxl7hGY2oVWkBLLaRtyvJYG4udMIrfaZbIL7Zw/XSK0EQbjVsTsMMsX7 6sBh1w13/AKMRZ/F2TmN+UOY2O/WWZgZAe8Tr8aO0Ccqag3PrmyGdVID0B9RGxsQ = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=xhTUByXmEYtHfFdfF8EFaXnNnns=; b=mgtQnnvw/fq7xqYsH RCBop5iibkQbxQpPiyj/VvlTZA6xKFq/oen7l+FH2qDC/B857fqrK54XnSebftNq Ft4OQubhqJNYbE7696hP1tc/e7an3VFY5myftD6cBGTAiG6DAnb/ez8FGfmK+U/5 v43UoMW7XoFugjKZTyYdEHDGNQ= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <51C1F0F9.70601@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:57:13 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: Adding MSYS functionality to Cygwin References: <51C0B08E DOT 8080900 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51C0D956 DOT 4090905 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51C1B299 DOT 1000701 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <51C1B299.1000701@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/19/2013 07:31, Charles Wilson wrote: > > http://www.mingw.org/wiki/Posix_path_conversion That's good info. I'm glad to see that relative paths are never molested. I tried for a while to confuse Cygwin and native Windows programs using relative paths, and failed to find a case where the path doesn't mean the same thing to both sides. > Not all packages are cross-compiler-compatible. Is that another way of saying that not all packages use autotools? :) You're not talking about anything different than the sort of thing Cygwin package maintainers go through, sometimes needing to arm-twist odd build systems to behave according to cygport's expectations? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple