X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=NwekI2JvacMMmOCvxWzKKgZtp8SyM+ hlt511v4XUirikKik7XFvumCLVtyq3L+k4+AYd/2+Uf2R+VXmp6IxHeEV4bipUg0 /jH/wXysbfzDxf6OvHBFTLGVtortOQmuheBkYzNY/jnukEoyACugOtpwxSUFdR46 TDCTI9/l/s6/0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=+7VdV9u1jN8xkUJl2OOzHOGwuqM=; b=uRel u8o/L2yGAHK0/SHUhr9NIiFlG3Hh+IvB0dgIRIlJZ01jvqZ+3oMeM4MzLXQKvo+8 /XQXtQ5Rek3RxsRWGeyz948COhAmmMX2jYA4FydXedmpPgUttEhqgzjdr4K24KmM zVaWqmdJonOFhc26lm2FViB1/YXQFTuYwofaQWo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:12:27 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Adding MSYS functionality to Cygwin Message-ID: <20130619101227.GL1620@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51C0B08E DOT 8080900 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51C0D956 DOT 4090905 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130619020234 DOT GA3669 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Note-from-DJ: This may be spam On Jun 19 10:53, Алексей Павлов wrote: > Today I investigate in this direction and find that logic works well > except one line in spawn.cc that I think can be fixed without break > anything. > > Index: cygwin/spawn.cc > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsup/cygwin/spawn.cc,v > retrieving revision 1.345 > diff -u -p -r1.345 spawn.cc > --- cygwin/spawn.cc 3 May 2013 19:39:01 -0000 1.345 > +++ cygwin/spawn.cc 19 Jun 2013 05:53:36 -0000 > @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ child_info_spawn::worker (const char *pr > } > else > { > - if (wascygexec) > + if (real_path.iscygexec ()) Line 374: wascygexec = real_path.iscygexec (); Do you have an example why your change should make a difference? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple