DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=dgBnBc+CKParBigpPmLuEEnaFAtoQP0LRvUMUBGcnnMkwBFyZ2/WO
	/NRRbh7tFEhIVPZMKGfJEu49ZgzNDXtTiQG13Rs8IhoaWodBDUz1GxCZMczQ2EHx
	c/VBIwwhiWGw21MthNVbIrJ520wbddaQTp5BeONw7+wyxkgUiu1kYY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:30:09 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: UNC and POSIX paths
Message-ID: <20130618143009.GA5406@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <003501ce6b5f$b41f2c10$1c5d8430$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <kpn4kk$p88$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <036c01ce6b6d$0ada5090$208ef1b0$@malth.us> <kpnfp7$urd$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <03b201ce6b83$c5b62720$51227560$@malth.us> <51BF534E DOT 2030200 AT cygwin DOT com> <044001ce6bca$16c79ef0$4456dcd0$@malth.us> <20130618044230 DOT GA6062 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <048c01ce6be7$5aea3940$10beabc0$@malth.us> <20130618102632 DOT GC27405 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130618102632.GC27405@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:26:32PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jun 17 22:47, gmt AT malth DOT us wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, at 21:42, Christopher Faylor thusly quipped:
>> 
>> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:18:12PM -0700, gmt AT malth DOT us wrote:
>> >> BTW, along the same lines, I stated previously it would break
>> >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob_plain;f=m4/doub
>> >> le-sl ash-root.m4.  Turns out I was wrong, the m4 has a hard-coded list
>> >> of platforms.  So, I have to say, I can't think of one technical or
>> >> merit-based reason this shouldn't be done, aside from the fact that
>> >> it's annoying to hear it endlessly brought up on the mailing list (a
>> >> problem which an implementation would, in fact, solve, not exacerbate).
>> > 
>> > I can't quite follow the logic here but if you're saying that if we no
>> longer
>> > treated // as /, people who want to use //usr/local/bin would not
>> complain,
>> > you're right.  That doesn't mean that a whole new class of complainer
>> would not
>> > show up, however.
>> > 
>> > I can say with absolute certainty that there is one person who would
>> complain.
>> 
>> I was imagining a less intrusive hypothetical approach.
>> 
>> For example, perhaps a CYGWIN=nounc flag that would simply turn the feature
>> off, or a way to deactivate in fstab -- in short, anything reversible, and,
>> by default, preserving the existing behavior.  Prune-grafting "//" to "/smb"
>> might have been a good idea had it been done at cygwin's inception, but I
>> think it's probably too late now.
>
>A mount table approach along the lines of the cygdrive prefix handling
>might not be such a bad thing, after all.  Something along these lines
>
>  none /mnt cygdrive binary,posix=0,user 0 0
>  none /unc uncdrive binary,posix=0 0 0
>
>This would also fix the somewhat special feature that unc paths get the
>same default flag treatment as cygdrive paths.

That's what I was proposing earlier in the thread.  It's a SHTDI
proposal, of course.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple