X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ge
	vd5xB6afTlSNBtxbeSR/eylaK9QjOXfmDqRQBx79fRWPE+GsE/v/NGMaqca0uTRX
	/mY3waq0F1CvELZmYNutVZ0YlOuTqYq0/OLp0xaa0wBN36Wv707GDQlRWS1scgNW
	PoD9IVjKkQaTSxITsukcwUCNJBw7Co3sE5OWUA9xc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=RdezIceR
	i1ZmaJjxcH+nvnPL0yQ=; b=KT9zk8+orwOXTl7rNBxTcvCYMjZu8MwO+R1PNzYO
	kifmoOqEKAjq0HMSW2/zuPArCAUmo1s6vHSgHdHa1PSe7fwNgckGnGtosHcGjL3i
	8vQ5Q49wUfUe48I1OgOZP9W2IuS7BaxGFzTDt/i7lQykiJcdxqvsOhVEKzjwWr96
	CkY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.238.42 with SMTP id vh10mr10064254wjc.28.1371539183802; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <002301ce6bbe$6b5601c0$42020540$@outbacktrip.info>
References: <002d01ce6b05$f2f16d40$d8d447c0$@outbacktrip.info>	<51BF74E4 DOT 5090203 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>	<002301ce6bbe$6b5601c0$42020540$@outbacktrip.info>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:06:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEhDDbCNC2GnN27rQHd1hA0HZmvLNpgx0GE1HHQvxDGs-qXeBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: vim-minimal annoyance
From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Shaun Fielder  wrote:
>> As Larry stated, the latest release of vim-minimal uses virc instead of
> vimrc (as done on Fedora), so this should no longer be an issue.
>
> Sure, now if I upgrade an existing installation and then type 'vi' - I won't
> see any errors. Great.
> However, I'll be left wondering why it isn't working like I'd normally
> expect. This is more subtle and arguably worse.
>
> If I have the full-featured vim installed, then I expect vi ==
> full_featured_vim. This is how it has always been.
>
> I guess I'll just have to resign myself to creating an alias (vi=vim) on
> every install...

Maybe there should be a "vi-as-vim" package which contains nothing but
the vi->vim symlink.

Csaba
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple