X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=DUGYMn
	Wknk4ILv4akr8+yRc4CVYyeIspaumfAtv88fSFpThTERbSylUs73WCs8S/xZN7M+
	Sq2NfmSEL/pnsTEyshgTJoJctHdTSNSYnRq4zO+2tDvHt6Oc+bISorcuJZ5bDPJx
	aU/bucW3THwf3xO0xGN71YbBcTfPqC1ItJsQk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=2erfgCQm4fcm
	uQhsp+BHSvgQlus=; b=LcoFGqoto2s0r98/XKtN8TEFBDPwx+selnexlDdNZ8KE
	h8SgcDvHZGWzsk7+dBkXqkDG3aN2fbBoduXMOIz1kiqjVFTK7FqNeiQ6mElfcco+
	F6gng7eH1ZUJzoeWt1djb4MVa+xfB4w0ul5vbeCL4vT8rASBNDVeKPPY5zk7xCo=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received: by 10.14.5.5 with SMTP id 5mr20895427eek.21.1371537339049;        Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51BFFFB1.8040701@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:35:29 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav_Zeman?= <vhaisman AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: UNC and POSIX paths
References: <003501ce6b5f$b41f2c10$1c5d8430$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <kpn4kk$p88$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <036c01ce6b6d$0ada5090$208ef1b0$@malth.us> <kpnfp7$urd$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <8738sgiqs8 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <000e01ce6beb$f5d55ad0$e1801070$%fedin AT samsung DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <000e01ce6beb$f5d55ad0$e1801070$%fedin@samsung.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9C4B523778946C6E6BA64C1C"
X-Virus-Found: No

--------------enig9C4B523778946C6E6BA64C1C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 06/18/2013 08:20 AM, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>  Hello!
>=20
>> Because some scripts try to use
>>
>> $(DESTDIR)/$(PREFIX)
>>
>> rather than
>>
>> $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)
>=20
>  Yes, exactly, this is what i have got.
>  I start to have these problems when i try to do non-standard things like
> cross-compiling Linux kernel and some 3rd party modules. :)
>  Ability to run 'make install_modules' requires /sbin/depmod. With hardco=
ded
> /sbin path. So, i have to cross-compile module-init-tools with '--prefix=
=3D/'.
> This is the first place where i get '//'. Well, perhaps i'm lame and
> '--prefix=3D' is the correct thing, not what i write. However i just foll=
owed
> the tradition here
>  Next, module-init-tools relies on either 'docbook2man' or 'docbook-to-ma=
n'.
> I guess both packages are considered obsolete by Cygwin, we have
> 'docbook2x-man' instead. So, i have to build one of those two packages.
> $(DESTDIR)/$(PREFIX) is found in the first one.
>  Well, perhaps irrelevant because it fails to build with new awk (or
> something like that, already don't remember). So i have found (ancient)
> docbook-to-man and built it. Works.
Does replacing "/" with "/." help or does it not help? I cannot test
this right now.


>=20
>  Also i remember getting this little problem somewhere else in the past.
> Already don't remember...
>=20
>  Now my last arguments...
>  First. Actually, we may consider this as kind of interoperability proble=
m.
> Technically it's possible to fix this at either side. However, let's say =
we
> have three packages suffering from this problem. So, it's possible to do
> either three fixes (for packages), or a single fix (for Cygwin). A single
> fix is less time-consuming. Especially taking into account that a half of=
 us
> uses Cygwin at work, where we have other tasks to do.
>  Second, if we take a look at real-world POSIX systems (Linux, BSD, whate=
ver
> else), they don't use '//' for network paths. Instead they use mountable
> filesystems. And Cygwin's goal is to fully implement UNIX-compatible
> environment, isn't it ? So, consequently, having a mount point would me m=
ore
> compatible with other real-world systems.
>  Third, package's author can say: 'nobody else has this problem, so it's
> Cygwin's bug, not mine, i won't fix'. Or he can simply blindly hate Windo=
ws.
> My another topic (cross-compiling Linux kerne) contains an example of such
> an attitude.
>  And, i agree, '//' is shorter to type than '/unc/'. :) And perhaps someo=
ne
> already relies on '//' in his scripts for his installation.
>=20
>  To sum things up, this was just an opinion. I didn't want to start a war.
> :)

--=20
VZ




--------------enig9C4B523778946C6E6BA64C1C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlG//7UACgkQ6OWUyaYNY6NMbgD8CkS+hzTLAV3Bjm0FlK114gwH
LIiTaogqN1j2t6A7stYA/Rph+/Md4eGrhzP3nrFyb/GCsqXiYcGtj214keHTadXt
=0Sx5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig9C4B523778946C6E6BA64C1C--