X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=W1DO5Y/fsNXD4PMa
	4eIdJ9Ywq+LgxE7O0D1o7fFgXIRCJGNeAi6jBaDI3Df4nnMPVTgXrjsJ0hqAxC05
	rqhBmE8fvL6K0B9vUbX0J2bcxDJEoMJ5gpj3103tUKeCnkwpwv3PtitNB62EoQKm
	MKx9Ans7YqPXEdYYZaZsBV13pQg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=P7+6h6kwNOF7wfPEu9z1Yb
	G0gyY=; b=puLVavdfNVDg4JdVe9slaZKdMDddPE+N1SJNnnhOfw1uXYVJT2s9eH
	5Gisgbjm/uJF0vqI+4JuL7VhuM5kFR9TxQ7leU0B91Q4Cvao8frn//i0DFKRBVxK
	1Ia/vvpLKyDQuHcyoG0i/XAzvNyG2Dn9KegtdEziGaptPWM1GA1As=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Message-id: <51BF6969.5080203@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:54:17 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Feature request] Setup64.exe should respect more recent packages' version
References: <CAHYyVz6f=bK4rPhOSaipCLOXtdgD0d+2E0WUFr_mNFxzdYZhpg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <CAHYyVz6f=bK4rPhOSaipCLOXtdgD0d+2E0WUFr_mNFxzdYZhpg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 6/17/2013 3:50 PM, Vasiliy wrote:
> On 6/17/2013, Larry wrote:
>
> That is the way it works for non-test packages.
>
> I'm not sure what mirror you're using but on mirror.mcs.anl.gov, bash
> 4.1.11 is the only version available for x64.
>
> ~~~
>
> No, it does not.
>
> I've compiled, and installed bash 4.2.45 for x64, and made appropriate
> changes in the /etc directory, so, it is up on the list of the
> installed packages. However, it keeps downgrading.

You'll need to update your local 'setup.ini' file to account for your
local version.  As Marco mentioned, 'setup.ini' is what setup uses to
determine the proper version to offer.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple