X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=lIVerDgkcFVuOilm
	5AkPkNSMywC8k47ZK9W8rjByw4Y77h4VDxYihg+aGE5MQRNUEiqwWfbi3Yk7o9Qv
	BgnuGonDvdPeYKI36gDDCz7sV6DVZYrFZATX2fIUBmVMrQds2p3S5BpO9qh8vkEk
	d8pc5xAC/QZ3jxJnlEq4MAvc/B8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=KdLHC5E/pauw9wDv223fTu
	+BgNo=; b=RaNuu5VwxMks5Hc400gyXr+epkIyllU1fcIl1yKxpYdXqk657Iw2/M
	YfMOTbGhcBOagFDjt/6ubp5knbFp8A/iBIqiOV1v8Cr603wXDpY6dCV68JcQPDrN
	sTN5sqAxj/PZdcFYzfvOztf5n0T5HRVPnDsBveie0Biq0Ey0ByUTg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Message-id: <51BF5D11.5060108@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:01:37 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [Feature request] Setup64.exe should respect more recent packages' version
References: <CAHYyVz6Euyswoakzc=-1cYN3K7OdbSTdtnUA2N_b0VntVKXk7Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <CAHYyVz6Euyswoakzc=-1cYN3K7OdbSTdtnUA2N_b0VntVKXk7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 6/17/2013 2:54 PM, Vasiliy wrote:
> Could it be possible for Setup64.exe that it would not offer
> downgrading packages by default if their more recent counterparts are
> installed? Example of an undesirable behavior: installed is bash 4.2,
> but 4.1 version is wrongly suggested, etc.

Setup suggests downgrading only when you've install a test package.
There's nothing distinctive about 'setup.64.exe' vs 'setup.exe' in
this regard.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple