X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Sg Nbg7gVkBRbqIa89euIkYDd6wMZM6VbhAFKXSabvRysJM65iol1ywRzI4pPD0pYc4 ca7e4bUgUSa0liDnqRPxPR9R+4/R3lgqon4X2VUFiuB7LU663FBrmYqzxS3Wmxis fjzYgyk815hPVrHtjL2cFZzaxL2psXBOUe9lLdRtU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=4g/ntmEb ymyAgKpzOw+d1YltipM=; b=NirolIp7aTN5Q4vDV62dbxPBk+x5+Ul+azNtSRqQ MExnUVRQHulBwsW2yikf2BWY7upijWIteYM8rvUdwi8yNV7gir1fG/mvSfd48AGL zZu0JWuL7ydqdn+4VoKxyklI/s9LhIOciqmyr1hhCy/DrEb3NYglSvSlsmYZ/rCR HCM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.69 with SMTP id x5mr7319239laa.57.1371495691053; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <003501ce6b5f$b41f2c10$1c5d8430$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <036c01ce6b6d$0ada5090$208ef1b0$@malth.us> <8738sgiqs8 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:01:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UNC and POSIX paths From: Dan Kegel To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Andrew DeFaria wrote: > I'm confused. Let me ask a different way - why not fix such scripts instead? > That's all I'm asking. He's probably daunted by the thought. If he really wants to change the world here, he should consider writing a tool that scanned for such problems, and lobbying to get it included in some broadly used suite of checks like lintian. - Dan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple