X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=vgcWsUIG1UB11O1Io3gS2vUBUzkLUD qtdNxUwk4/DVKwbvPFoSVAAtC2BUpUBdeeHm27zv6DS9NnY6RonqxT4cPk/+I1qf Esrc1O+T3RIiiGLt+lC5s5SQREf2FfShloo9EagJNynry2aD6oh+8Rdxk+BJPD2V DoHcyNEDko6xQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=m49pWUbCliehWCPonn4UVpg856E=; b=pK/o meOe+tlDvjrXsLcnA7WxkDOYowfUpUylt5XtvA+LRyXFobhCFX6Y2oJ3+XuCMubn kOrupyW7rw3ASYBwT5U9zQu1jnTejljAapLn63Qa7Is9cDxdtfCgfTu180XCaet0 bKuIfXfxuJe80ZQIwBc9g5eNLePAzB/hjLrwuIM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: UNC and POSIX paths Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:35:58 -0700 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <003501ce6b5f$b41f2c10$1c5d8430$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <036c01ce6b6d$0ada5090$208ef1b0$@malth.us> <8738sgiqs8 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: <8738sgiqs8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> On 06/17/2013 10:35 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Andrew DeFaria writes: >> I'm trying to understand the reluctance towards "fixing the problem" >> and instead the insistence on "putting a band aid on it". So in the >> above, why would you not instead do --prefix=/usr/local? > Because some scripts try to use > > $(DESTDIR)/$(PREFIX) > > rather than > > $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX) > > or otherwise insist on adding a slash somewhere in the expansion of > directory paths without checking whether they are "" or "/". While it'd > be preferable that these expansions be fixed, simply prepending a few > more slashes usually works when the system follows POSIX rules since > only "//" is special. I'm confused. Let me ask a different way - why not fix such scripts instead? That's all I'm asking. -- Andrew DeFaria Copywight 1994 Elmer Fudd. All wights wesewved. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple