X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=tWT5oR2ET67mWzJjxX9P6HWBhsPRTiIG2FILDj07b+w B9tT7OS5QhdJLtf1wnJa38BXD4inSmOtb8vqPh5PICmrA3zjhJN+OmhSsSu4uKUY qgcMGmPvo1qIFH9xkXG66/aiKy5RZ/nSLFLHRu28LQ4MXC6KJLzrQGEF4Q30PLHY = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=W6T+OglEzV581WJaNDbqj2HquPU=; b=pEd7t6U/iloRGc213 1vBhkAUdgXyF2lo0w0VDqDGc02Il12BvpsrMceFPW2sPKQ9ARV1Yj7m5Dxn5y7Ys FGmxcmndYGgYRfeXvGVWiNgYuy9s4ishIG/VyZBusog7afIymMOHl6nZlUAnRAYN f/1vwiqV4JXIlsWbB07Q8IMKos= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:sender:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language:x-gm-message-state; bh=PbUHK3UEP+6Gj1uRY9FkxAF7dCewnOzvVh7YHfEGglI=; b=C7bWH3fTcumOd8ZCWvohwIz6Xvp9+7GdGNuBsIJHxLUmXyTC+H+CNVu1OCfK1xlQHL 701vkDQb6+FI11vB/a01NyE9EGsayc1su2MS9wsYPDjabPPZM+SlTVf0cKtW4o423Lub iewinJUwSA1aYWNC7dtU9tiYXpCe8f7h60hYKzpSg53nlY5nA62EbPkSU3ryI/zTvqRG ++uNKHeomjRVcsAm5ViTwSrsLVuSBCXVmKGxDuCsZ+7Dl1cfrRY1bp44MehlehbNVRws qti0Ah4zBWNY7nyiV6EpVJgTCLfYNa3ZiJ0iUJBeMQihlprIN0IMLsEkgsIJV5lhJFBl o2Dw== X-Received: by 10.66.136.76 with SMTP id py12mr13253507pab.192.1371481939315; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:12:19 -0700 (PDT) From: To: References: <003501ce6b5f$b41f2c10$1c5d8430$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: UNC and POSIX paths Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: <036c01ce6b6d$0ada5090$208ef1b0$@malth.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmR01IPAirjn9DmzvF/ZqucmnXO3NaWFWiSmqNX86I8/uPcvM1mDjZ5BTxsyXabqm+ZY1QF On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, at 06:57, Andrew DeFaria thusly quipped: > On 06/17/2013 06:36 AM, Fedin Pavel wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I decided to pay attention to one more problem. Lots of not very >> well written configure scripts and makefiles like to access things >> like '//usr/bin'. Under Cygwin this causes problem because Cygwin >> treats '//' in Windows-style as access to network shares. >> What if we change this ? We could have a mount entry, something like '/unc' >> (or /smb, /net, whatever) and access it like '/smb/computername/sharename'. >> I think this would improve POSIX compatibility a lot. > Why not simply fix the "not very well written configure scripts and makefiles" > instead? BTW I've never come across a single one of those. > Where are you getting yours? Can't answer this offhand (aware you didn't ask me :P) but, under the misguidance of PM's like Gentoo(portage) and rpm(build), when combined with poorly and/or belligerently written packaging scripts, this can happen incessantly. But that mostly only comes up when building Frankencygwins. Sometimes you can fix it by forcing something like --prefix=///usr/local. A CYGWIN env flag to disable UNC paths, or graft them somewhere other than //, or an fstab-hack--basically anything allowing one to turn this feature off--would be a moderate blessing for a small number (greater than or equal to one) of people, but SHTDI, and this is endlessly proposed and insta-shot-down. At least one "merit-based" argument does recommend against implementing this -- a great many configure scripts test for whether // == /, which means packages could break if packagers happened to build while using the proposed anti-feature-feature (the inevitable response being, "shouldn't those packages just fix their broken configure scripts"? :P) -gmt -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple