X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=mn5tmHgqjSh5Sp34LW5GVYp3Gos5Ny26oM2n5vIOl5K
	vW+uC93PFtMWmv3Y3T9DmZIr8JGuOZxOUE4GIaBQ1OTinzmMldtuLRBto/fanGNL
	gigaLkJ6vsXVnzEICMD3ri8p65MG2tn3gy/ONEOvoOh0ZPlJbdNOjrI2GxMq7msE
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=6Y6vrpLgZ1ttRVPxaQMq0cHoKR4=; b=UWQMfNfEcOAWYRB34
	dFvH8smx6ZEh4TW53jGPtjrdxrSCxdzbxs3OGzDWGmJdR00V26UfeVIjlQ1R5ARG
	TZX9NSZpw2mOHNm5AZXiAebNkwngPXFUYEDB62pAP2YscQxd/mXb3gqol8sU1/dX
	RQKuw/W5V6cvWzsWZpuCuQRoZ4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received: by 10.68.252.227 with SMTP id zv3mr72447pbc.14.1371115786228;        Thu, 13 Jun 2013 02:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51B9910B.7070108@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:29:47 -0500
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.1152-1
References: <announce DOT 51B65778 DOT 8020200 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <CAKf2h5RZ6UcHC11BZt-50Y0gh8MLijk5iobWHzSjLb8HjexL=w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKf2h5RZ6UcHC11BZt-50Y0gh8MLijk5iobWHzSjLb8HjexL=w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2013-06-11 02:07, Frank Fesevur wrote:
> 2013/6/11 Yaakov (Cygwin/X):
>> This is an update to last week's upstream patchset, with the following
>> packaging changes:
>>
>> * The 'vi' binary now uses ~/.virc and /etc/virc instead of vimrc to avoid
>> errors with configuration options not supported by 'vi'.
>
> Any reason why you stopped using alternatives?
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-05/msg00068.html
>
> It was removed when it was really needed with the introduction of
> vim-minimal. Especially when vim-minimal was added to Base.
>
> It solves the vi != vim problem:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-05/msg00068.html

These are two separate issues:

1. The vi (vim-minimal) binary, alternatives or no, being compiled with 
FEAT_SMALL, does not support many of the additional features which users 
may have enabled unconditionally in their vimrc(5), leading to errors at 
startup.  This release fixes that in the same fashion as Fedora, by 
using virc instead.

2. Some users are accustomed to typing 'vi' and getting 'vim'; that 
doesn't work on Fedora either, and using an alias is the simplest 
workaround.  I suspect there are good reasons for not having 'vim' 
supplant vim-minimal as the 'vi' command, but I'll have to look into it 
further.


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple