X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=J+pfVaLrp7qUNHiE/gjrRIRoVugiFzKm4rFwpEZ5KAOWxRkZJ794l s5tJyN7wPg2riowD+j7YDu8sn/5gY4N9DawNs7C9jyN1PBaOvSY5OjblZhKSGLuH EGKKeWX6pBleNOKJRxrtskW4S58o7DpRVUfeVmMVHFFKtl9ig6GOFE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=s7LiSBL73oIQh0eXqls70G+ILY4=; b=A2RBgcKn05sjfunEqG9Urh/Whc5E 5RIsQSK7gs3OLldstaimDvhCMvVpjOR6HK9xaOeAGkBq/WlaUjq3aDKWl7bgCB25 zIXp07ugu+NFLBrVNsIVY9whs5vs7uU3R3wse6DB6uyb1lJbV8wWYKKXw27NycHc 4Q/PD2eBUmY8zgo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 13:55:44 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 1.7.19 Message-ID: <20130609115544.GG12283@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51AF530A DOT 7080306 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20130605162825 DOT GC3250 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130607114015 DOT GC32420 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130607141120 DOT GB22187 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <7810384312 DOT 20130609154329 AT mtu-net DOT ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7810384312.20130609154329@mtu-net.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Jun 9 15:43, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > >> I do not think I explained myself properly, sorry: Cygwin would > >> previously read the > >> obcaseinsensitve value under Windows 2000 to emulate the case > >> insensitive behaviour of Windows XP and newer where obcaseinsensitive > >> was present in the registry. > >> > >> The registry key does not represent the active state of case > >> sensitivity, so it is surely the wrong thing to query and show in > >> cygcheck as it only shows what the state is pending a reboot. Surely > >> it would be better now to query how the case sensitivity actually is > >> here and show that, and get rid of all references to > >> obcaseinsensitive, which is a configuration parameter and private > >> implementation detail of kernel? > > > Not from my POV, no. The registry key is what the user has to change to > > get case sensitive behaviour. > > But that setting only permit case-sensitive behavior, but not actually > implement (enable) it. > Actual behavior of case-sensitivity relies on actual support from filesystem, > in case of disk IO operations. > If I read it right, of course. Yes. We're talking about cygcheck, not the way the Cygwin DLL handles case sensitivity. We want to know the kernel setting in cygcheck output. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple