X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=oYG+AeGhU5qPgSL6 03jL6I6r6QJqbm+Q+xblMzMjMTzOdme8q9ITJnc0x4kCDwWP0893aa3BTIOmxeDr 7a4ID/GHime6cXcAtVZTQ7LouSkMlvQO1R6nFYpMQQF6eDLZJWiOUZ4JET4SsX8v lHNrdN/n2SWvAS1AMq/JItzPqR0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=LylfurBVy5lVtGK0Jj49iF ub6MA=; b=T4WuUDr85ae90W0rmWkvj7N+7emK2Bn+u2O8FG11/ltXAsu1GWLGRT 7HwDwoNrDxvOyVnw2ECmmpGxTHyoSYJ63QcQeMgtBFt0iYVnWcY/7Ob9GTXi8vM2 NQhqmR38zwUuOVdc9PBF3k9OJx6RyRIkr7u8b3Qr57tnTsM5Y2LCE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_YG autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 15:43:29 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <7810384312.20130609154329@mtu-net.ru> To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 1.7.19 In-Reply-To: <20130607141120.GB22187@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <51AF530A DOT 7080306 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20130605162825 DOT GC3250 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130607114015 DOT GC32420 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130607141120 DOT GB22187 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! >> I do not think I explained myself properly, sorry: Cygwin would >> previously read the >> obcaseinsensitve value under Windows 2000 to emulate the case >> insensitive behaviour of Windows XP and newer where obcaseinsensitive >> was present in the registry. >> >> The registry key does not represent the active state of case >> sensitivity, so it is surely the wrong thing to query and show in >> cygcheck as it only shows what the state is pending a reboot. Surely >> it would be better now to query how the case sensitivity actually is >> here and show that, and get rid of all references to >> obcaseinsensitive, which is a configuration parameter and private >> implementation detail of kernel? > Not from my POV, no. The registry key is what the user has to change to > get case sensitive behaviour. But that setting only permit case-sensitive behavior, but not actually implement (enable) it. Actual behavior of case-sensitivity relies on actual support from filesystem, in case of disk IO operations. If I read it right, of course. > We want to know if the user actually changed it in the first place, > otherwise we can point to that info in case of a case-sensitivity related > problem. The active state may be interesting as well, but additionally to > the registry key info and, as far as I'm concerned, it's a minor problem. > But, anyway, http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 09.06.2013, <15:41> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple