X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=u8Fq75SisvCJcBaq W3vMYgoVWARTR7YlIFNdE0VPSQyPGrHoiBP0QHYSRcVRHhUbuNWmaChTUB8Ro30h Zn0dmiXtoecZbBXDD4/oA/TjirBD1DcwF6OJR5rX3qcQ8m7i3vAmGsF0COW0lAIu h52q5A8Iqh7sSvqjn16lMOyYma8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=kPqMXQDlX8XdWf6hknv7jw N6Y2g=; b=rOcOzIsINZZpqNcU2tIos7JcOkjv6OaJ4AzttHIWNEnDwOVHGN0++5 20c3CnU/17y0zqj1Hw2T6995momi+xa8q85rIkiumO18sDhgJltFK+2PeqBzUUh4 d9hP3hGdw1X1OK/m0nCS0Btw/69SHqO7tDiJ1oL3rY7OlexJj2BHs= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:10:18 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <21158364.20130607171018@mtu-net.ru> To: Nick Lowe , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 1.7.19 In-Reply-To: References: <51AF530A DOT 7080306 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> <20130605162825 DOT GC3250 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Nick Lowe! > I notice you are still reading in obcaseinsensitive in cygcheck.cc but > this value is no longer used in Cygwin as you have dropped Windows > 2000 support. > Would it make sense to change the code there to show the actual state > of case sensitivity? Nick, was it you, who wrote this article? http://www.nicklowe.org/2012/02/understanding-case-sensitivity-in-windows-obcaseinsensitive-file_case_sensitive_search/ Thanks for it, if so. But the more frustrating it makes your post, as article clearly states, that > It turns out that there are two parts to this. Firstly, a single setting > that controls case sensitivity on system-wide basis, obcaseinsensitive, and > then, assuming that case sensitive operation is supported, file system > support on a per-volume basis. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 07.06.2013, <17:03> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple