X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=IK0KVogBzCYo6rPLtpLcKOPXDOtd2AcjZpYBlPEPj9CY2phCv25bC sIXTvpI5UGNKfgeb6fJ0vTC16uRuJOoHqQIEOt6W3CPTOdgOeiKwc2ICxC9eZChK SlvvgMcRGI1xnykxD28Ak+ILp7Qn7TLwXBCSrszp6Ip/2XUyM3pSPs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=1xn+STu6HmoxH797mOsKvGt/uwk=; b=H5a8f5WSATL/3vcvxx39C5y56Iu/ e0QCLyXH1eaBrHhs0oHBdUpc0F8VciZFmZ6pH3zT2YlDONg57llKTGtD2x3EEZ3T QM4t9h6wqUZhlUoTrNK4QdWfqyHT73t0WGcucs8X+fa77anL9EkKx/22/VQJwIPw eIziR9L4XUwuzQA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_FC autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 12:31:25 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sqlite3: bug with monotone Message-ID: <20130602103125.GE13934@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51A6B6EB DOT 6050309 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <51A7862F DOT 1070507 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51A7D47E DOT 3050502 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <51A7F547 DOT 6020509 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130531092228 DOT GB30659 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51A900EF DOT 2020606 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130601105741 DOT GC30659 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130601105741.GC30659@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hi Warren, On Jun 1 12:57, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > If F_MDLCK is not such a bright idea, maybe another fcntl is? Something > along these lines: > > fd = open ("my.db", ...); > #ifdef __CYGWIN__ > fcntl (fd, F_SETLK_MAND, 1); > #endif > > As for the user, we could add the g+S,g-x stuff additionally at one point, > but I'm rather reluctant to provide these means at all. See below. > [...] > There's a lot to recommend not using mandatory locking at all, unless in > very limited circumstances where interoperability with native > applications using mandatory locking is required. [...] I just applied a patch to implement mandatory locking. It also supports F_GETLK, with limited usability due to Windows restrictions, as I explained in other mail. It does NOT yet support BSD flock locking, only POSIX fcntl locking. I dropped the F_MDLCK idea. Instead I implemented a specific fcntl code to switch to mandatory locking on a file descriptor: fcntl (fd, F_LCK_MANDATORY, 1); The name F_SETLK_MAND didn't seem right. Anyway, afterwards, you can use the usual locking fcntls, but with Windows mandatory locking semantics. I didn't add a way for the user to switch on mandatory locking for now, and I don't intend to do that for 1.7.19. Hope that helps, nevertheless. I'm just about to generate a 2013-06-02 developer snapshot for 32 bit, a 64 bit DLL will follow tomorrow. Please give the 32 bit snapshot a try ASAP. I intend to release 1.7.19 very soon, probably tomorrow or Tuesday. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple