X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=p4zUHFrA5UkajW2s4lZi4NODj0aJbWzJHqwR99lDL36pzxGsLMD1C 4MuGwViVpw6mUmyik1Zl2xq+gEZuCHEuadRsV4AEpf4Or7alk4sQtArSClQuIYfq XND30klf6YL5YXP4QVTGVqypU1yDvukjmtH22cOfFEgRq5KdEdW100= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=1nnpCeC3HdaBXxqlo2Nte8YZSMQ=; b=ky8AH6GL0uA1Gs/PR9fUTr0Cg2zN wqJ6ftyUXWRk4eYdyNvJdR3jfFMoUPVcal7XouuMUwF/ddIWr665Li1u2+mwG5az YhYgJjf9zMkQ6RPecivBFFrHVq2zPZKbXS/Y42vwXrh9dO6zUa9n5TiW3GEKUqtP 1OcgrVsTXACsRDw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,TW_MK autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 10:56:35 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Shadowcopy volume block devices Message-ID: <20130602085635.GA13934@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20130528133514 DOT GJ5264 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130528153302 DOT GL5264 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130529084703 DOT GE31309 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Jun 1 19:46, Micky wrote: > > I'm looking forward to your feedback. > > This is now working like a charm! On the upside, I noticed one more > thing. Unlike dd on traditional cmd, your implementation doesn't copy > the zero blocks -- which to its considerable benefit is a humongous > time saver for me as now I don't have to compress the image to save > space! Whether this was intentional or not, I think we should keep it > this way. And I do appreciate your instant fix! Thanks, but my "implementation" just opens the device and reads from it. There's no other magic involved. If it doesn't copy zero blocks, it's an OS feature. > > Btw., as a sidenote, are you aware that you can access the filesystem > > underneath the volume shadow copy as well? > > Yea, that was the first thing I noticed. I thought it was cool since I > don't have to run diskshadow.exe or mklink to mount a volume. Just > open up the bash and everything is there for you. Whoever came up with > this idea, is a fathomable genius :)! > > Btw, when is this going to be released in stable branch? I did test > the dumped image by restoring it, which also worked fine. I intend to release 1.7.19 at the start of this week, probably Monday or Thursday. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple