X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=DOwnamN4n8xVLtEOyEm2QpK+vGFGZtBVP/Jybe+AQxUBxsPASHg/t 98IxDIluFbJazQgGSdI+EWk/5VG3CJOlfB2qQs1JLc2Y+ALS+Q5kRSr4SFx4nrZc veSUNN47f14KYXctEnqaNF1hZDBtnjFr9DmAyjJhkP8CaIcWSo4nOo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=AMhfqntNd9SLBkVmUrg6ZsT200M=; b=eOjL7n8CP0iTjzOE69TEEKrTMYtE Y7AiCKas1HjgBhv4xTsvcp6E1U7Eza3APSfQf/zOhmWLqTUtKS3x7xxvNEG4dSC1 WoA/j1NRSEeXQv73aGwSgjDUbHSisuvsDxeJp04mWphPqM3SB6OBSEE5wdAI6BVG zqDHiK10/sbfYR0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:08:31 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Attn: Yaakov [Was: Re: cygutils Postinstall Script Errors With Exit Code 128] Message-ID: <20130530090831.GK4471@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51A684AA DOT 2060904 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <51A6948B DOT 3000807 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51A6948B.3000807@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On May 29 18:51, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > But now that you mention it, is cygutils *supposed* to be in Base? > It is marked category: Utils, but seems to be pulled into Base only > because of cygwin-doc (which *is* in Base, oddly enough; shouldn't > it just be Doc?) listing it as a dependency. That sounds strange. Was cygwin-doc always in Base? It contains the cygwin docs and basic man pages but that doesn't really qualify for the Base category. Also, why does cygwin-doc depend on cygutils at all? It only contains info and man pages, so the deps should be coreutils and man, but nothing else, AFAICS. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple