DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=OvJuerpMQXVeDFjEJ4Rvs0EF4zIK7xVs7E2WLgP43+hVNaAuSPrBP
	2RGW5emSbMgsQ8W6Djeo+Q8IItS8aBQSUj9hgqBgA5+oVeUJ4P1RlsIwa+Dc50YX
	ISWJVDAWGyhiGAJY7PtSjNjEhgZ+mLusmmLLTuRWAXrzdxn2TqN+OY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 19:07:23 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: STC for fork SEGV after dlclose
Message-ID: <20130527170723.GF28463@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <51A38C2B DOT 6060706 AT acm DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51A38C2B.6060706@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On May 27 09:39, David Rothenberger wrote:
> The libapr1 test cases starting failing with my 64-bit package and
> 1.7.19-6. They worked fine with 1.7.19-5. After a little
> investigation, I discovered that only the tests that involve fork()
> were failing and only if the "testdso" test case ran first. That
> test case checks loading and unloading DLLs.

Sigh.  Thanks for the testcase.  I wonder if it wouldn't be easier
to drop libapr1 instead... ;}

> I extracted the attached STC. It creates a simple DLL and uses
> dlopen() and dlclose() on it. Then it attempts a fork().
> 
> With the latest 32-bit snapshot (2013-05-24) this causes a
> segfault. The same thing happens with the 64-bit release. With
> 1.7.18, the test case hangs for quite a while, but eventually
> finishes, except that the fork() never really happens and I get a
> weird error code when I run it in gdb. If I skip the dlclose() call,
> the STC runs fine.
> 
> It's weird, but the libapr1 test suite does not fail on 32-bit with
> the 2013-05-24 snapshot (or with 1.7.18). I don't know why the STC
      ^^^^^^^^^^
      ????

Above you said it fails on 32 bit with 2013-05-24, too.  What's the
last working snapshot?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple