X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=sIVbFVSwFpmoFpltp1gh9+NPzk1HrBwP0QbBxx9IAZb
	2duhhfh6tHWjrtsDZIwfJqDAQ1Q1yodmk4ahdxk8PfninpZbGsifxG0e3X+tn2S9
	yvjMiRoFODZB2SIxChV0qtqYwkZmRU1Uu33AVeIgExJdjkhp7x7b7YWLtFoHpzZQ
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=/CN2RaS9pCyZZ1fGSGhbAXIXTJg=; b=IpPUoYKjuLw1KDnIB
	zwDkBnu1pl66MYjOno/9ZBG4Gq1YxIRBkhqraD3CM3XQHMb1kiZyYd5DeaLuR++F
	bn7P2EqIo+b7QmrlYF4CYHCAxAllPadnS7WQ3/JfB5bWNkfuOSh9x3K7Gf2DDNtC
	1RAZZrIXNO948pOMAWPP3JN3+Q=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received: by 10.50.25.2 with SMTP id y2mr510612igf.86.1369432530650;        Fri, 24 May 2013 14:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <519FE1D5.3080801@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 16:55:33 -0500
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: luatex font path problem
References: <517D54B8 DOT 1060109 AT gmail DOT com> <517EA41F DOT 3040404 AT cornell DOT edu> <517F3170 DOT 3080107 AT gmail DOT com> <518977B4 DOT 1010803 AT cornell DOT edu> <519A94E0 DOT 5040808 AT cornell DOT edu> <519D792F DOT 2030402 AT gmail DOT com> <519E316F DOT 30301 AT cornell DOT edu> <519E597D DOT 8050800 AT gmail DOT com> <519E736C DOT 903 AT cornell DOT edu> <519EEB53 DOT 2080908 AT gmail DOT com> <519F5E19 DOT 40602 AT cornell DOT edu>
In-Reply-To: <519F5E19.40602@cornell.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2013-05-24 07:33, Ken Brown wrote:
> I'm not comfortable removing the version test, since I don't know the
> reason for it.  As you say, the low frequency of zlib updates makes this
> a minor issue.

If you were to rebuild texlive immediately, I would agree, but as you 
aren't planning to, right now it is a major issue: users should not have 
to choose between the important bugfixes (not to mention the new API) in 
1.2.8 and a properly functioning luatex.

I agree with the conclusion in the Gentoo bug entry: the version check 
is completely superfluous and should be removed, so that this does not 
continue to be an issue in the future.


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple