X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=tHt3LCLD9j5uzUh1 k2qrHoy7BQcQHNmiHRAn/kS74sxyUcweczHj+G2ZBqFm9hrX3q0FIe0IG93Vb+sw ZgHHsWy5bnuBGwAN+GJsaedaobrw5R7G24ledcG2P8LmeN4D4N7PIrw0xiBUJRic /oARvTtT2ezujV99Ke22CwJW7OM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=gbRpzeDQ+2k8ju9PbWxE6A Orbhw=; b=toio0miBkd7nmapJN1sFQ+ZwG9oqoE2KA6/Sv29NbR/Vg62c+53v9z GvisGEMyTzqHV/80/qWZHQYaOTam0CLShXLsAwufzvWZJ6rzqrfZOFHb8Qd5gffz ebG2sYOkuCvQbynEXyr5pdoKECy3+1FC+H6WbuVH2f2vfb7ZNaRQI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Message-id: <519B8A51.4070505@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:53:05 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517083612 DOT GE21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517102655 DOT GG21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130517145612 DOT GC7087 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <001a01ce5550$9e20afd0$da620f70$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <519A3E58 DOT 4010609 AT cygwin DOT com> <000101ce55e9$6ab6f840$4024e8c0$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130521061816 DOT GC3786 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-reply-to: <20130521061816.GC3786@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 5/21/2013 2:18 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:07:03AM +0400, Fedin Pavel wrote: >>> Not to discourage you but there will be a fairly low tolerance for much >>> of a complexity change or almost any performance degradation. Cygwin's >>> performance is a regular source of complaints on this list (and >>> elsewhere). >> >> By the way... Right now i'm testing 64-bit Cygwin, and it appears to be >> significantly faster. I wonder, did you do anything special to achieve this >> ? Or does this mean just that 32-bit API on 64-bit Windows is slow ? > > The 64-bit port employed fewer hippos. As it turns out, they were terrible > coders. And hippos aside (I think we all know how difficult it is to do that!), 64-bit proggies on 64-bit CPUs are supposed to be a little zippier anyway. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple