X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=dgwwN6G1XH36m8cGrvI2kILywlp928T6zSZi5P/uMZ4
	MUgo9gyKME0wN2r5bSpdWuTC7+6t0NvZpyxCy2KPTLJgMVuMAlARe/Mklc1HlPbu
	frS8iGeK0m+Ehrp11mi/hhEaKBMtzCsfpm/JvZZ/pJT3sNS9Ur4qh9EdDShzQLFk
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=y6S6xXB+Ewzh6hpMJczapqdSQ8c=; b=Ew7M4WYlJk1/J5szj
	Q2dA+u/cqfTRmTgzzj+4mtkmKrGEUWDlm7LXyyiyeDxrCyztsZuo+OJ+jjCqLGDr
	h0P7H5ijzbaLpjJapwCA/15m8wJIb3SPOleTIhPvgWcRVjcS2tYV/AZc3ca4jeSP
	6gbBC0zCAeCKxEOx5Sp0LY2kxI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received: by 10.42.50.202 with SMTP id b10mr33068010icg.7.1369080531275;        Mon, 20 May 2013 13:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <519A82D8.3060605@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 15:08:56 -0500
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Difference in 32/64-bit curl.
References: <51766C22 DOT 10702 AT bahnhof DOT se> <51770372 DOT 4070408 AT t-online DOT de> <20130424125930 DOT GQ26397 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1UUzp1-23sI640 AT fwd56 DOT aul DOT t-online DOT de> <51784CC0 DOT 7050304 AT t-online DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <51784CC0.7050304@t-online.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2013-04-24 16:21, Christian Franke wrote:
> The attached patch would actually fix the issue. Likely not the correct
> way to do this as va_arg(param, long) is also used for the other integer
> options.
>
> Is this possibly an upstream bug which is hidden on Linux et al. due to
> a different x64 ABI (which requires register parameter zero extension) ?

I believe it is indeed an upstream issue that affects more than this one 
option.  Care to take it upstream?


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple