X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=FXNqWTxmH7RKL5wiZ2xD7ZazZxoVTO22bN9BRGH8zPa9Z9UUamLiG
	+OkZmLaOtCihJkgfjFA19Y+WOurmpbFFCud9NsNJqKRlXE7nnQY2VFT48WN4NDfJ
	bB+B02E+xuZDnkHPiwjZ/r0lMFt7qgccIyc24fkXV2eH6/4YBx2yYY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=+n5ncbZj1j1bLx0istVluUITUSY=; b=nsrJdZciEYepnWEyHXwYxDsMjaIg
	7yIcx2L6loIyhlfEuR4ncASP76LWyXGbDDBqES7nnzuxvXUKmuU8FBS+0UdpqF8v
	h+ZNI2DlwgUdEasemra7fcFooVHKa6d0lFIJBJfPZHTPPtFucPQTP3zl4u8Xc3fW
	G6HjOV2tSLAtnNE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_SEMBACKSCATTER autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19utq5x+TAG2LpjRyQ+CtRO
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:56:12 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories
Message-ID: <20130517145612.GC7087@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517083612 DOT GE21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517102655 DOT GG21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130517102655.GG21752@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>>  Hello!
>>  
>> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
>> > this list.  See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html,
>> > for instance.
>> 
>>  Heh...
>>  So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ?
>>  Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we have one use case...
>
>Not without lots of new code.

So, maybe next Thursday?

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple