X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=M/KalSzpuMx2I3305hP8ShYKq3YGz5mdqZ5yY8lfb/A2inQDEnkVp unOh9nyhS98CpLDNfgMYPTVD8M5w3RFjWNGaXgwMR/fSCDor9DvdxGbnNCUJ+FhM 25Bt3Nnyw8NesPAu8+bfCp/DRsor0MM49cDkfrsP9wb/HPT1lTsuXI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=csSM3SKE4B2G9aXfPX5GS6bH5YA=; b=cjbChBHB84tt42oOIEA81e32kjMK LzifD3JubVb3i83yEz/XRiJXQ2AARNN1rdC/G+nVtOdk6Hc6/eGU+3RHogvtb3hp 5KNDWl5iB19p4OgzS+2B4NZBZoGjvZBmMzBihBNXpNY7cDKaiCuFkkJn50gNFIeG EL+IoUFFNVVSc8E= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: David Griffiths Subject: Re: vim-7.3.943-1 missing command 'let =?utf-8?b?Zzpjb2xvcnNfbmFtZQ==?= = "elflord"' found in vim-common-7.3.943-1 Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 13:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <1368733719 DOT 30936 DOT YahooMailClassic AT web162702 DOT mail DOT bf1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20130517070620 DOT GD22373 AT phoenix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) Gary Johnson spocom.com> writes: > This is not a bug. See Yaakov's announcement in the list on May 12, > "[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.943-1". He explains that the > packaging scheme has been changed and that /usr/bin/vi is now Vim > compiled with the "small" feature set. The "small" feature set does > not include the +syntax or +eval feature and does not support either > the :syntax or :let command. Not a bug maybe but a strange thing to do. I just installed a completely unrelated package (p7zip) which just happened to drag in the latest version of vim. Suddenly I start seeing these E319 messages and the syntax highlighting has gone. Luckily I found the answer here via Google but I bet you're going to see a lot more people hit by this! Cheers, Dave -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple