X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=Px4XSF3D20+PfUiTL5CxC7wRcU+9zIe5WDE41EAjhT2/BPDLLJiju +UpwO3IKImACH//MGU/c1aTRSYEJXMNn5Oezy7CAWDRWju/5gTbjRdW34G6HZfmv 5KIBescTyxrlH9m8cnranR4hD23JNAQl02ogWj/LmMBwpt4pba73A0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=T5QOIF03idENNO7fPoAkoXvOokw=; b=WxKsNzCeOShyCy4Evog3y3It+dzu O+ey0G5HCwLhgO70h/B5o7q2MJ6fL1PIwmBAgJpbGU2LGn0tdWfDFUTa8glMV+NG t1mwfs+EYsNSuKzv3nZIq0cs+WYDUtl38KrQeh5FEVL9420+UP6E2p0/rgHiMhwH XG+4Teulmopv7Nw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 12:26:55 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories Message-ID: <20130517102655.GG21752@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517083612 DOT GE21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote: > Hello! > > > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on > > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html, > > for instance. > > Heh... > So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ? > Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we have one use case... Not without lots of new code. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple