X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=K7/OR3MV6BMEp75xccESyCroLuapA/iL10fLhhFZwYUZw5qrqqspJ
	PjxYzzUGMj8CtygwQo/XKjn3MchvrOkzuDRgsiPvc1kOepxJGqUXRlfj7OXX/El4
	s/ER+WjRJE4JP4lvwh4NzEESyNd4QCaCZodlPpe906UB25P5P9EMOw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=41s1aNwmMAe5ljTJ5jlQb13sT9I=; b=o3AU9u3aWkEp5Y0nXX5G4AdMhdGP
	Py5hLW8Te7uG3JHQB7hke3qTE0nWHQC/QzNLt+BK4WKQ2fn0jaXm9tqnfROuX0Oi
	7yLkvcY1urtDBoYILIspf0NVzyMmE4QAhxzfFpl0A0D4O6BU9gsEHyGwdyIre0Jf
	gc1FLyx+uSBj4GM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,EXECUTABLE_URI,TW_YG autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 12:26:29 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 64-bit toolchain questions
Message-ID: <20130517102629.GF21752@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <000701ce52cd$4276d360$c7647a20$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <CAHWeT-Z-LwqvFrxcZ+KJXgWGZkeQXXF0dX3d210oi=GPiQupaQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <001001ce52e6$2c24ad80$846e0880$%fedin AT samsung DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001001ce52e6$2c24ad80$846e0880$%fedin@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On May 17 14:06, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
> > You need a 64-bit Cygwin install to run it in. Well, actually just the
> > 64-bit cygwin1.dll in case of "Hello World". Unfortunately you don't
> > get an error message in case of a missing DLL.
> > 
> > ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/64bit/setup64.exe
> > 
> > (Warning: this is still very much in beta.)
> 
>  Wow, cool! At last!
>  Installed and tested it. I believe i should be able to at least run C compiler in this environment.
> 
>  And take one small bug report. :) I wanted to port my spawn patch for 'make' and noticed that make is a cygport now. However looks like cygport is buggy a bit. 'cygport make prep' ends up in:
> --- cut ---
> *** ERROR: SRC_DIR is not correctly defined
> --- cut ---
>  I'm not really familiar with cygport, however after studyin --debug output i managed to work around it by adding 'SRC_DIR=" make-3.82.90"' to make.cygport. For some reason cygport seems to ignore VERSION and tries to extract $PV from .cygport file's name. Perhaps renaming it to 'make-3.82.90.cygport' would also work, i have not tested.
>  And also, for some reason, supplied patch was not applied automatically. I had to do it manually after 'prep'.

I'm sure you didn't specify the .cygport suffix:

  $ cygport make.cygport prep

This is required for the new style cygport files.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple