X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=VG1mPu+CyeQYOhzI+aJ0ygVDOo4mn1vdlKQl1qutURi VS8I7RfabmVc20VWbPAjxIYTcIhAyYDmR3Y7HXavO4USf82ahb3QVtcZmhfVTKvD m55RFii9iSb/58c4q0F3eSLBPOVUafgvB9z7EVW3IOuQBOMJTr3WMOQd8kFz8Ghk = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=3P5OOCQ0AUobF7sw9fs1rIHgz7Y=; b=lK2zwovzV43pHUWYQ 7akwQY9c0+fxC4Y1T0JduAwGTag6I79+mUJcKdWwZJBHSFW7KpYi44ohBLvKK9x1 sHOVXhP5Bf/xI5z/WzQ4fVfFMNk6s8+BnLEgpDPodQFV1LgpxNZLHPRsi2Afrnu0 fwhD32kzF2s191uic5NwoYJMoY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_VIA_APNIC,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 From: Fedin Pavel

To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517083612 DOT GE21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-reply-to: <20130517083612.GE21752@calimero.vinschen.de> Subject: RE: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 12:56:43 +0400 Message-id: <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r4H8uwaa005779 Hello! > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html, > for instance. Heh... So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ? Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we have one use case... Kind regards. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple