X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Xfr6+lYR2yuo6VpCFQQCb80/cNHgT82C58/sUPKNGWJ bDK7x8rqh48ZLKj9V6OLwKWF3439OHCjlm4eZEeZm1jFv/BdQEnCmqUClqWVN+RE 2dBhRJ5HVnoaaeP3PbumipFOwhI/0k+JeLUo849DGhQ7RiJEWjQVtZfm2N747kIg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Vqh0U9pYL6D5mwAM/S26ZrEUVaA=; b=AphFpHZZj7PMLM/MG UEh9+nYChXwE5nCMjCjQV6AesuTd0XjxtQw3Cj1RHTrVb4zxk5mAuJYz4yRsiOfk SluLAv8AmxU/c3ZGycZ64BbN76MKOhAt8LE3Jm0PUAInIoQKKvgXiJ+HfWbyfP0E PZyHSvfuO6RrhQAjPKSFufhEgs= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_SEMBACKSCATTER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <51770372.4070408@t-online.de> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:56:02 +0200 From: Christian Franke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0 SeaMonkey/2.16.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Difference in 32/64-bit curl. References: <51766C22 DOT 10702 AT bahnhof DOT se> In-Reply-To: <51766C22.10702@bahnhof.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fredrik Rothamel wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that in 64-bit cygwin curl always include the > http-headers in the response. > (Old behaviour is to only include headers when -i option is specified) > > Is this an intentional change? Unlikely. In this case it should be possible to revert the default -i (--include) with --no-include. According to a quick gdb session using curl-debug package the corresponding variable config->include_headers is not set during option processing. But later in Curl_setopt(., CURLOPT_HEADER, .) the variable data->set.include_header is set true because some va_arg(param, long) is nonzero. Possibly a __builtin_va_list related gcc bug. Christian -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple